Triumph Rat Motorcycle Forums banner

Robertson vs Phillips

3.8K views 42 replies 20 participants last post by  Felony  
#1 ·
Why do manufacturers continue to use Phillips screws they are next to useless if you dont have two hands to use? I know this has been discussed in the past but the Robertson square with the slight taper stays on the end of the bit (for the most part) and allows for a positive torque rarely stripping. This comes up because I was installing a new dishwasher and 5 Phillips were supplied for the three leveling feet and the kickplate. Lying on my side on the floor trying use the Phillips was a none starter, I threw them in the garbage went down to the workbench and found 5 Robertson and as we like to say in Canada "Bob's Your Uncle"
Henry Ford realized the benifit of them when building his model T, it dramatically cut the production time but he refused to pay the royalty and all the other industrialists followed suit. Well the darn patent is finished, Get on with it manufacturers!!
 
#5 ·
Yes so many different configurations it boggles the mind although I doubt the Square is actually the Robertson. To take the battery out of my Speedmaster I need Torx, hex and phillips plus because I lost one of the hex head and happened to have a slotted head machine screw I now need 4 different bits. LOL
 
#3 ·
Henry Ford realized the benifit of them when building his model T, it dramatically cut the production time but he refused to pay the royalty and all the other industrialists followed suit. Well the darn patent is finished, Get on with it manufacturers!!
Your plea is falling on deaf ears. Most of the manufacturers don't speak English. ;)
 
#18 ·
Unfortunately for my Suzuki, I learned about the JIS screws too late. I could not figure out why I stripped out so many "phillips" screws on that bike. Of course when the dealer assembled the bike. If they used a torque wrench at all, they must've gotten the Newton meters vs ft lbs mixed up. Some of that **** was sooo tight, it had to be intentional as if the employee was disgruntled and having a bad day. The bolt that held my battery holder in place was steel. Threaded into aluminum subframe. I had to use a frickin 1/2" drive breaker bar on it to loosen it up. I looked at the mangled threads on the steel bolt. Right away I was deciding to either ream out and tap the aluminum subframe and use a helicoil or do I ream out the hole and stick a nut behind it? I looked around the subframe to see what was involved in its removal (I knew a machinist I could take it to as a favor) And that was when I noticed the threads on that aluminum alloy were just fine. I got a new bolt from the dealer, as it had a funky shoulder and could not substitute it. And I was back on the road. I really lucked out on that one.
 
#20 ·
Unfortunately for my Suzuki, I learned about the JIS screws too late. I could not figure out why I stripped out so many "phillips" screws on that bike. Of course when the dealer assembled the bike. If they used a torque wrench at all, they must've gotten the Newton meters vs ft lbs mixed up. Some of that **** was sooo tight, it had to be intentional as if the employee was disgruntled and having a bad day. The bolt that held my battery holder in place was steel. Threaded into aluminum subframe. I had to use a frickin 1/2" drive breaker bar on it to loosen it up. I looked at the mangled threads on the steel bolt. Right away I was deciding to either ream out and tap the aluminum subframe and use a helicoil or do I ream out the hole and stick a nut behind it? I looked around the subframe to see what was involved in its removal (I knew a machinist I could take it to as a favor) And that was when I noticed the threads on that aluminum alloy were just fine. I got a new bolt from the dealer, as it had a funky shoulder and could not substitute it. And I was back on the road. I really lucked out on that one.
The JIS (Japanese Industrial Standard) vs. Phillips aspect is so confusing, especially with the parallel existence of the very different Pozidriv, etc. (although I don't think I've seen them on vehicles. It seems JIS may have been superseded by DIN standards?


One day I must buy some premium DIN/JIS drivers as described in that article. It seems they should be best for Phillips or JIS/DIN. As it is, my JIS impact driver bits are mainly wrecked after an encounter with seized Honda car brake disc retaining screws (for which they were a perfect fit but not tough enough).
 
#25 ·
The right tool for the job, huh? That’s easier said than done when talking about Phillips Head screws. The problem is, all the sizes of drivers “seem” to fit every screw, except when talking about the extreme big’uns and littl’uns. Even after all these years, I can’t tell by looking which screwdriver really fits. And, when I grab one, the tip always seems to fit into the slots. I mean, think of Allen Wrenches. One size too big, won’t fit in. One size too small, the tool just spins around. If Phillips Heads were like that, we’d be much better off.
 
#26 · (Edited)
The problem is, all the sizes of drivers “seem” to fit every screw, except when talking about the extreme big’uns and littl’uns. Even after all these years, I can’t tell by looking which screwdriver really fits.
"Seem to fit" is the mark of an amateur. Tools fit or they don't.

Common Phillips screwdriver sizes are 0, 1,2,3 . Pozi Drive and JIS screwdrivers are similarly sized.

Telling the difference is not that difficult if you know what to look for.

Putting a #2 Phillips in a #2 JIS screw does not "feel" right and vice versa.

Often times a JIS screw is differentiated from a Phillips by a "dot" on the screw head near the "cross".
If one takes the time to look the difference is really obvious.

Knowing the difference is a skill nurtured by pros with the right tools.
As a pro you bugger up enough screws and have to remove them and you learn.

For a DIYer with a limited toolbox it is more challenging, BUT the RIGHT tool for the job s the ONLY tool for the job.

If you really want tool confusion then there's the SAE-Metric-Whitworth/British Standard.

Image
 
#27 ·
I have turned a lot of JIS screws in my time and I have rarely seen the identifying dot.
I bought what they were using when I was working in Japan. Hozan brand JIS drivers. They at first feel kind of dainty to what most of us are accustomed to. The shaft is smaller in diameter than many named brands, but they are really good tools.

As for the comment ="BUT the RIGHT tool for the job is the ONLY tool for the job"
Anyone that has turned wrenches for any length of time, knows that does not Always apply. But a good point to try and practice.
 
#28 ·
I have turned a lot of JIS screws in my time and I have rarely seen the identifying dot.
I bought what they were using when I was working in Japan. Hozan brand JIS drivers. They at first feel kind of dainty to what most of us are accustomed to. The shaft is smaller in diameter than many named brands, but they are really good tools.
The "dot" was more prominent in the 70's on bikes from the BIG 4 then it seemed to disappear.

Hozan tools are first rate on a par with Snap-on Phillips screwdrivers.
 
#35 ·
To further muddy the waters, I used to work in a fastener company on the trade counter. People often complained that the driver bits we sold were garbage as they chewed out. Some stuff is mesured in "Rockwells " which is a mesurable degree of hardness and the theory is that the driver bit should be less rockwells than the fastener so you don't chew out the phillips head in the screw. Easier to use another driver bit than try to remove a chewed out screw. Unfortunately the manufacturer (China or India) don't know or don't care how many Rockwells their product is. Hope this has added some mud.
 
#36 ·
Helpiing a buddy the past few days restoring an old RR the subject of Robertson came up, he having travelled in US more then I have he said it is almost impossible to find a Robertson screwdriver so if one is going south bring a set to tighten or loosen screws.(if you happen to have a need) Someday they may make the rounds.