Triumph Rat Motorcycle Forums banner

Aluminum vs. steel sprocket

1 reading
10K views 19 replies 15 participants last post by  triplestrength  
#1 ·
Anyone have a preference? Obviously the steel wears slower but you sacrifice some weight. How much longer do you get on a steel rear sprocket over an aluminum one?
 
#2 ·
Significant difference in life, Steel is the way to go. The amount of weight savings, even with this being unsprung weight and reciprocal mass, is not going to make a big or even noticeable difference on the street. If you were racing, well, maybe, perhaps, kinda, aluminum is the way to go.
 
#10 ·
Going to an alloy rear wont gain you anything back in acceleration that your butt dyno would feel. Not worth it in my opinion.
 
#14 ·
I used a 19 tooth sprocket on my 07 black and didn't care for it on the back roads. The bike had a bit of an issue pulling that 19. I found it even bog a bit pulling grades at elevation. Went back to the 18 tooth and it works fine for me. Didn't notice any top end or high speed advantage with the 19 tooth at all. Gas milage even stayed about the same. Still have the 19 tooth, maybe would use it if i was going to do freeway cross country or something. That being said I found you had to stay above 60 mph in 5th to not bog the motor down. 5th gear on ths bike is really a 6th gear with 5th gear removed from a six speed transmission. So 5th is in somewhat of an overdrive range on this bike as it is.
 
#18 ·
My path was to go to a 520 chain w/ lightweight steel sprockets to reduce driven/unsprung mass without sacraficing the longevity afforded by staying with all steel components. I went with the drive systems conversion kit:

http://www.drivesystemsusa.com/c/4229601/1/800-bonnevillet100-02-06.html

Installed the kit 2 years ago and still happy-happy with this change....

Cheers,

--Rich
 
#19 ·
I was just wondering if any of you nay-sayers have used a reputable alloy rear sprocket made after 1985,or are your experiences base on the cheese/aluminium alloy sprockets made in the 70's :D

200+ hp world superbikes and 225+hp motogp bikes seem to manage with alloy sprockets that are of a lighter construction than the renthal sprockets I use,
I have managed 14000+ miles (still no signs of wear on the spocket) on a renthal alloy sprocket on a bigbore 130hp kawasaki zxr(zx7)

the advantages of alloy sprocket other than lighter weight are less inertia (not a reciprocal force as terry suggested), which manifests it's self as easier accel and easier decel, also less gyroscopic effect which means easier changes of direction.

don't under-estimate the effects of inertial force. why do you think wavey brake rotors were introduced? (not for any braking force benefits)

on it's own a change to an alloy sprocket may not be noticeable to the average guy, but if you've gone to the expense of light-weight alloy wheel rims for the above mentioned benefits, to not change to an alloy sprocket means you would not be getting the full benefits from the lighter rims.