Triumph Rat Motorcycle Forums banner

Triumph 400 Singles

7.7K views 30 replies 17 participants last post by  gentlemanjim  
#1 ·
Guess we'll need a new section on the forum. These look great. I just hope that Triumph maintains the fit and finish we have come to expect.



 
#2 · (Edited)
Despite the article saying these Bajaj Indian made bikes will be available in India soon and 'in all other markets' by the start of 2024 I suspect 'other markets' could well end up meaning Asian markets only where they'll be going head to head with the just about to be launched Harley Davidson X440, which will be made in India by Hero Motors, and the X350 which will be simply a rebadging of an existing QJ Motors bike already Made in China. Triumph and HD are both very wary of the potential brand value dilution these bikes could inflict in Europe and the USA. These tie ups with established Indian and Chinese manufacturers allow them to compete in that market segment without massive R & D, development and production costs so they can see how it goes and to walk away if it doesn't pan out. The ultimately ill fated venture with the Indian built 500/750 vee twins burnt HD badly both reputationally and financially.
 
#4 ·
will be available in India soon and 'in all other markets' by the start of 2024 I suspect 'other markets' could well end up meaning Asian markets only
Here from an interview with Oliver Willand from Triumph Germany:

"With the Speed 400 and the Scrambler 400 X, we are expanding the range of two extremely successful model series from our Modern Classics range. We therefore think that we will be able to realize a volume of around 350 units sold in Germany and Austria in the first year alone. In our estimation, the mix will tend slightly in favor of the Scrambler 400 X."

They really want to start 2034 in EU.
 
#3 ·
@Terry Colley, your points are valid. However, Triumph's approach might be different because, according to Cycle World, "As such, it will be manufactured in Triumph’s three factories in Thailand and in its Brazilian plant, as well as at Bajaj’s Indian facilities.". If the 400s were produced only in India, I would expect Triumph to have less control over the final product.

 
#7 ·
Wonder if the 20 year olds will dream about the Scrambler 400x the same way I did the Honda CL350 back in '72?
For me it was the Suzuki X6... eat that Honda for lunch

Image


and then there was the Bridgestone 350...

Image


And the ultimate Honda 350 eater... Kawasaki A7

Image
 
#8 · (Edited)
As you rightly say back then there were bikes that could eat the Honda for lunch alas they lacked the all important name 'Scrambler'. Merely adding that tag to a bike imparts capability to conquer ANY terrain on the planet. If you couple that name with a high pipe and handlebar crossbrace you easily double those capabilities. The Bridgestone you referenced was the best of the bunch but it was the GTO not the GTR that was the alpha male of the genre. I believe the R in GTR meant Road and the O in GTO meant offroad but who knew? They should've persisted with the Hurricane Scrambler name originally used for the 175 twin.
Image
 
#15 ·
#16 ·
A friend had an Avenger. I had a Yamaha YDS3 previously, I was impressed with the Avenger compared to my Yamaha. He traded it on an H1 which he highly modified. It was the quickest thing I have ever ridden. Had to roll-on the throttle to keep from getting hurt. He lit up the rear tire when nailing it rather than slipping the clutch.
kk
 
#17 · (Edited)
The white 1969 H-1s were a blast to ride. You just twisted the throttle to the desired angle of the motorcycle. The H-2s took motorcycle wheel standing to a completely new and terrorizing level.

When they came out we warned every buyer of exactly what they had. We had a yard full of H-1s within 6 weeks waiting for back ordered rear fenders, tail lights and seats.

And yes, the A7 was a nasty little 350 but got overrun by the nice guy Honda 350 advertising campaign and got lost. Kawasaki was completely caught up in promoting the H-1.

A decent rider on an A7 could make a British twin rider wonder what had happened if they tangled with one in a straight line.
 
#18 ·
His was a '69, white with the blue. His mods were from Tony Nicocia (sp?) who drag raced them setting national records. The bike was a brute not real pleasant to ride. Idled at 2,000 rpm, vibrated and the powerband was like a light switch. It was fun to ride, I didn't really get on it as it wasn't mine. Just rolling on the throttle in the first three gears resulted in wheelies which required the rider to back off. Good times.
kk
 
#26 · (Edited)
For today only my local Triumph/Royal Enfield etc dealer has the 400s and the new 1200 Scrambler to look at and sit on. I sat on the Speed 400 and not surprisingly I found it to be much like my RE Meteor 350 in size, weight and seating. Very comfortable except the handlebars felt kinda wide and flat, like a scrambler. For my liking I’d need a different bar or risers that bring them back a bit. The fit and finish is as good as it looks in its videos. Handlebar controls and switches are all familiar, just like other Triumphs.
Sadly, I didn’t sit on the other two, I only ran in to quickly pick up my RE plate and registration and my wife was waiting in the car and we were on our way to someplace else. Salesman remarked that Triumph redid the 1200 scrambler to make it lower.
 
#28 ·
So I showed up to check one of these bad boys, albeit a couple of days later than I could. Little did I know that when the dealer told me they would be there Monday, he forgot to tell me it was a one day only event.
When I showed up on Wed to take a look they told me the two bikes were being toured to the local dealers in the Tri-state area for one day only at each site 😡 😡
 
#29 ·
Yes it was only 1 day at each dealership. The only way I realized that is that I was on two different dealer’s email lists and one had them on Friday, and another one in my same state had them on Saturday.