[Max_NYC]

Raaks out of question I think. (The most aggressive I've read).

Norman Hyde rearsets, LSL, others?

By less aggressive I mean less rearward of course.

Max

 

[raproe]

I have the LSL rearsets. I haven't seen Raask rearsets in real life, but from the pictures on their website, there doesn't seem to be much difference in the location.



[ This message was edited by: raproe on 2006-12-18 12:45 ]

 

[FattRat]

Go the Norman Hyde rear sets,
ower and rubber cushion for the tootsies.

I think LSL and Raasks are in the same location.

 

[Guest]

I had the norman Hyde rear-sets with M-bars for about a year. I finally sold them (the old knees aren't what they used to be). I put the stockers back on and added Jenks risers. Now it's very comfortable. The NH rear-sets are the most original looking.

 

[raproe]

On 2006-12-18 16:26, bjoba wrote:
...The NH rear-sets are the most original looking.

It depends on what "original" means. The NH rear-sets most closely match the "original" stock foot pegs. However, the Raask and LSL are more like race equipment and most closely match the "original" rear-sets used "in the day" like you would find on this classic Manx Norton.