+1 ON THAT TORS ARE A WASTE OF GOOD MONEYeven with the TORS you are still have the airbox, which is very restrictive. TORS with the airbox removed and a rejet will give you the most HP gain, not just putting on new pipes. and if you are gonna spend the money for TORS you might as well get a superior pipe like dominators or predators which allow the bike to breathe even better and sound way better as well.
Without jet change.Rob...was that 60hp with or without a jet change?
Thanks,
George
But will the DynoJet do any good with the restrictive stock cans in place?So TORs are worth about 6hp. This would make sense as I seem to remember that was the figure quoted in 2001 when I brought mine for the Bonnie.
If you are looking for an easy upgrade, I would recommend the DynoJet stage 1 kit (I'm talking about the Bonnie - I'm not sure if they do one for the Scrambler). It's not cheap, but it is a lot cheaper than a set of TORs, and gives a good result. IMHO, it seemed to be at least as good as the TORs - no dyno to back it up, just what it feels like to ride. It will also work with TORs as it comes with 4 sets of jets.
Yes - definitely! I felt it was a better VFM upgrade than the TORs, which is why I recommended it.But will the DynoJet do any good with the restrictive stock cans in place?
very little, but will sound better.Just curious to know if anyone has any idea as to how much extra hp you get from TORS on a Scrambler?
Oh and what do they do to the torque figure too?