|
|
» Main Menu |
|
Discussion Forums
Features
Motorcycle.com Links
Contribute
|
» Links |
|
|
|
| Twins Technical Talk Technical Talk for Hinckley Triumph Twins: Bonneville, T100, Speedmaster, America, Thruxton, and Scrambler |
 |
|
12-13-2006
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Supersport 600 Favorite Bike: Thumper the Thruxton
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: austin, tx
Posts: 159 Extra Motorcycle: yes, please
|
Just wondering if anybody has picked up this issue. They have a comparison between the Thruxton and the Duc Sport 1000. Not a good review for us Thruxtons.
__________________
After partying all night, Chuck Norris doesn't throw up, he throws down!!!
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
12-13-2006
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Premium Member
Site Supporter Powerbike Favorite Bike: Y2K RS
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 394 Other Motorcycle: 750 Monster
|
very bad review, made the Thrux sound like an underpowered, overweight, puny sounding, poor handling, Poser Pig.
and I'm sure I missed a few points?
Very odd since past reviews haven't been that brutal.
:???:
__________________
...
I have enough money to last me the rest of my life, unless I buy something.
|
|
|
12-13-2006
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Supersport 400
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 84 Other Motorcycle: 1966 Norton Atlas Extra Motorcycle: 1974 Suzuki TM400
|
Haven't read the article, but I'm not surprised. After all, isn't the Thruxton pretty much a T-100 with different needles and mufflers (with cosmetic differences of course)? I'm sure I'll get tonnes of feed back from Thruxton owners proving me wrong, but when compared to the Ducati...there is no comparison.
|
|
|
12-13-2006
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
World SuperBike
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Stroud, OKlahoma, USA
Posts: 2,331
|
The Duc is 127cc larger, 61 lbs lighter, produces 19 more hp and 11 more ft-lbs of torque, and costs $3500 more. Surprise, surprise--they like the Duc more and it outperformed the Thrux. I think they should compare the Duc with a Triumph; however, the Triumph to use would be the modern cafe racer--the S3. :-D But that will never happen.
Yeah, they pissed off some old farts, but look at it another way--sure made the Duc look bad when they picked the Thrux to compare it with. Didn't want to compare with another sport bike that is close to equal in weight, cc, and hp.
I thought the comparison article was pretty well written--most of the Thrux "deficiencies" noted in the article have been written on this forum by Thrux owners. "The engine sounds like a tea-kettle whistling" was a little bit different way of saying it sounds like a sewing machine. :-D
In the end they concluded in the comparison article that the "Triumph is the more authentic cafe racer, but the Ducati is the better motorcycle."
I think many readers skipped the comparison article and went straight to the "Off The Record" page where Tim Carrithers, Executive Editor, and Brent Avis write a couple of paragraphs each and take "pot-shots" at Triumph. I don't think their comments went very well with the actual comparison article. Again, I think the Duc's reputation suffered more than the Thrux from their "bashing" comments. For the price of the Duc, you can have an S3 that has a real suspension and a LOT more performance. :-D
Larry
__________________
Larry
2003 T-100 (790cc), NARK, NH Togas, 8100 rpm rev limiter, 158 main jets, 42 pilot jets (less than 1 turn out on pilot screws), stock needles--no shims. 13 A/F ratio from 1100 rpm to 4000 rpm; 12 A/F ratio from 4000 rpm to 6000 rpm; 13 A/F from 6000 rpm to 8100 rpm.:D
2007 Tiger 1050--White:D--SW-Motech crashbars, Skidmarx rear hugger/chain guard, Calsci +7 windscreen.
|
|
|
12-13-2006
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
250 Grand Prix
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Missouri City, Texas
Posts: 139
|
Well said RedBird. I like the looks of the GT1000 but I wouldn't give up my T100 for one.
|
|
|
12-13-2006
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Powerbike
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 375
|
clip-ons, rear sets, couple more HP, smaller front rim, 41mm forks with adjustable preload, floating front disc, slightly shorter wheel base, taller, thinner and not as much chrome stuff. I don't like chrome stuff anyways. So in a nut shell it's a little sportier and just a little more wonderful.
TJ
Quote:
On 2006-12-13 12:03, Hilts wrote:
Haven't read the article, but I'm not surprised. After all, isn't the Thruxton pretty much a T-100 with different needles and mufflers (with cosmetic differences of course)?
|
|
|
|
12-13-2006
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Super Sidecars
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 41
|
I read the article and was amazed at the criticism of both bikes, especially as an owner of the Sport 1000. Personnally, I didn't buy the bike to be an ultra-modern track rocket. If that's what I had wanted, then I'd have bought a Superbike. I bought it purely for the Retro look and feel and was pleasantly rewarded in both categories.
While I don't have a Thruxton, I do have a hopped up Scrambler. It does exactly what I bought it to do, as does the Duc...put a smile on my face everytime I ride them.
__________________
Scrambler Mods: snorkle and restrictor plate removal, K&N filter, Thunderbike exhaust, CRG Lane Splitter Mirror, Mini Turn Signals, Bonneville Seat, Black Flattrack Bars, Gran Tourismo grips, Re-Jet so far - Thruxton Needles, 1 shim, 120 mains.
|
|
|
12-14-2006
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
250 Grand Prix
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Costa Mesa,CA
Posts: 141
|
I love it when the rags grow a pair and get brutal in their reviews,,,even when it focused on a favorite of mine.....Nothing is worse than a sweet sappy love letter to the manufacturer's marketing dept...
As someone who was around back in the heyday of the late 50's and 60's...I don't have a problem with the idea that maybe those were not such great days for the quality of bikes....We worked on them more than we rode them....
Todays Triumphs are way better than any of the bike back then, but compared to the featherweight sportbikes of today, they can't hold a candle performance wise...
Compared to the bikes back then they are "cutting edge".......Just apples and oranges
I'm keeping my Triumph,,, it suits me very nicely and that is what matters........
__________________
If we arn\'t having fun,,,then we arn\'t doing it right.....
|
|
|
12-14-2006
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
World SuperBike Favorite Bike: Speed Triple, baby
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 2,262 Other Motorcycle: R100RS Extra Motorcycle: TT600 - Spongebob
|
Interesting. I was looking for a new bike, something sporty and fun to augment my workhorse BMW, but not a full-on repli-racer. I looked at a BUNCH, including Suzuki SVs, Monsters, etc. It came down to the BMW K1200R (just too big and heavy), the Sport 1000 (high maintenance, low hp), and the Speed Triple (just right, baby :upthumb:
For the price (and upkeep) of the Sport 1000, you can have one helluva thruxton.
__________________
"I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me."
— HST
|
|
|
12-14-2006
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Supersport 400
Join Date: May 2006
Location: FL, USA
Posts: 83
|
Ducati's bribe was bigger.
|
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|