Quote:
Originally Posted by joerockhead
If you wish to base your argument on a legal "duty-of-care...from the moment it's fitted to your bike", please demonstrate why tire manufacturers have such a duty. Comparisons to other "duties-of-care" are acceptable, but any explanation that falls back on vagaries such as "common sense" will be dismissed as BS.
|
I can't comment on OS jurisdictions, & I was hoping not to get drawn into a legal argument, so I hope I'm not about to bore everyone silly. But in this country duty-of-care, as it relates to motor vehicles, is clearly defined under the Trade Practices Act, & basically states that companies have an obligation to ensure that any of their products that are fitted to a vehicle, not only comply with all current ADR's, but are also as safe to use on the road as the company can make them (I'm paraphrasing obviously), It's deiberatly broad in it's definition, to try & cover anything the ADR's don't.
As I've already said, experienced riders know all about this issue & have long ago come up with a remedy they're happy with (me included). So I can understand rider's being a bit defensive about it, because it's become part of the "secret knowledge" that sets us apart from the cagers. But this is hardly in the same league as kickstarting a big single or clearing flooded carby's. This is, potentially, very dangerous. & it's the newbie's who are most at risk. Who we, as experienced riders, should be doing everything we can to welcome into the fold. They are the future of motorcycling. & they deserve to be safe!
Sorry about the rant. I think I need a cup of tea now.