Well... maybe "disappointed" isn't quite the right word...
What I'm wondering is, has anyone bought a Scrambler thinking it would be the perfect do-whatever-they-want-to-do bike (whatever it is that they wanted to do...) and then after riding it for a while (a day, week, month, year, whatever) decided that they're going to need a different bike as well or instead (something better for dirt, or for touring, or more sporty, etc.)?
My dilemma stems from REALLY liking the looks and the "idea" of the Scrambler, but wondering if I should instead look to a pair of bikes - something like a DR650 for dirt and a Tiger or Bandit for road riding and a bit of touring (light touring, but touring none-the-less).
Obviously the 2-bike route involves lot more $$$$ and would certainly be a big hit to MY wallet (I'm not rich).
But the Scrambler seems like it'd be such a FUN bike. Even for just short errands around town. I've never had a bike like that. Every bike I've owned, I've always felt like I needed to "go on a ride" or else just take the car. I can imagine wanting to take a Scrambler up to the grocery store to get something for dinner. Or to the coffee shop in the next town over just cause I'm bored. I don't know if I can see those other bikes as "fun" in that way.
My last bike was a BMW 1200GS. I was disappointed. It was a PIG off-road. And it certainly didn't have the "fun" factor for me - I wouldn't ride it unless I was going to be going at least 50 miles or be gone for at least 2 hours. It did tour pretty well though (I went from Colorado to Vermont and back on it).
Ok... I'm just rambling. And probably boring you to tears.
But... does anyone know what I mean????