Quote:
|
Subject is closed as far as I am concerned.
|
Somehow I didn't think that statement would remain operative for long.
Quote:
Originally Posted by doglanta
I will stand by my beliefs and statements that the International Motorcycle Show is a great way for manufacturers to show off their products to the public which in turn will stimulate brand interest and sales. And be sure that Triumph is like any other motorcycle manufacturer in that their number one goal is to sell metal.
|
Both true, with qualifications. Yet it does not therefor logically follow that Triumph should jump on the same bandwagon as everyone else. Were Triumph in the position of having excess production capacity (they don't) and/or ready to make a sudden expansion (they're not--they do it by a careful timetable, not based on current market whims that would necessitate debt), it might make sense for them. Right now it doesn't.
They make no decisions of this sort capriciously, and they review their strategies on a regular basis. This is a company that pays more attention to its management consultants and focus groups than most others I've encountered. And the results seem to be panning out for them. They've remained consistently on track for their sales goals since discontinuing the expense of attending all these shows. They're running well in the black. As long as that holds true, can you find one convincing argument why Triumph should change their minds? I sure can't think of one.
Quote:
|
Don't be a show-hater just because you don't live in an area where the show visits. I think if you were in the market for a new bike and lived near a show city you would also find it a valuable tool in making your purchasing decision.
|
And kindly don't impugn other people's motives without knowing the facts. Up until two years ago, I lived only a little farther from downtown Atlanta than you do, and will again in about two months. I used to find the show interesting once in a while, but it was never a factor in any of my buying decisions.
Before I buy, I usually have a pretty good idea what I'm looking for already...be it bikes, boats or cars. I research online, read magazines, call or write for literature, and visit dealers. True, you may get to see a new model at a show a lot sooner than you'll see it at a dealership, but I don't buy on that tight a timescale anyway.
Now, if other people do, that's fine. I don't criticize anyone for enjoying the show. for whatever reasons they may have.
But it's an excessive leap of logic to think these shows are an indispensible marketing tool for
every manufacturer, or even most consumers! They're not a trade show in the classic sense. That's not why they exist. They are first and foremost a profit center for the show's organizers, let us remember.
That's why it strikes me as silly to criticize Triumph for not participating in the hoopla--especially when the evidence is very clear that they still achieve the results
they (not you nor I) are seeking, without all the bother. If the day comes when their sales turn stagnant while other marques are on the increase, then you can bet we'll see them reconsider. Right now it's just the opposite.
I get the sense that some people take it as a personal insult...a sign that Triumph doesn't love them any more or something...but it's one way they keep the company healthy and the products priced reasonably at the same time. If that's "tough love," so be it.