I've just ran out of petrol for the second time on my 2006 tiger '955, and I was p!ssed off to say the least
I've always relied on the trip miles rather than the fuel gauge or light.
This time I ran out on 196 miles on the trip, and when I filled up I got 23.15 litres in what is supposed to be a 24 litre tank.
When I checked the sums I'd got 40 miles / gallon. Last month round Europe I was consistantly getting over 50 miles / Gallon. Is there something different about British fuel that gives lower MPG ?
Why didn't Triumph leave the tank at 25 litres as it was with the Tiger 900
Why didn't Triumph make the tank bigger as the bike is supposed to be an "Adventure" Sports bike
These questions we will never know the answer to
That's great, I feel better now after that little rant !!