|
2pgee,
As Pickaxe mentioned earlier, he is a Police motorcyclist and I'm sure he'll have all the relevant advanced (I hate that word, it's not advanced, just a logical well planned approach to riding) riding qualifications to go with that.
I'm a motorcycle Instructor, in my spare time away from the Fire Service, and teach all the way from basic training up to RoSPA Advanced Riding, and I fully understand why he would use the rear brake for most normal riding situations. If you are reading the road ahead, planning your ride, in a flexible gear, using "acceleration sense", you should'nt need to do much braking anyway.
When I'm out and about I also see riders who've passed their tests and taken no further training, and they've got into bad (probably not a good choice of word) habits. The way some of them use the brakes, in particular the front, is an absolute joke.
I suppose it's down to personal preference, but the benefit of using the rear brake in urban situations, especially on a long travel suspension bike like the Tiger, is:
There is little fork dive.
You can still blip the throttle to downchange through that notchy box.
The bike is more evenly balanced, instead of loading the front.
Most importantly, you've still got the front as a "back-up" if anything unexpected happens.
I would recommend taking Advanced Rider Training to everyone. There is so much to learn, and you never stop learning. I don't know what organisations do this type of training in other parts of the world, but I'm sure the Brits will have heard of IAM and RoSPA.
If you think you use too much front brake, why don't you have a go at using the rear brake more in situations where you would normally use the front. See what difference it makes - good or bad.
Last edited by graeme : 03-11-2008 at 01:46 PM.
|