Fuel Economy/Range per tank? - Triumph Forum: Triumph Rat Motorcycle Forums
» Main Menu

Discussion Forums
 » Twins
 » Tiger
 » General
 » RAT

Features
 » Blogs

Motorcycle.com Links

Contribute
 » Photo

Motorcycle Forums
» Insurance
» Sponsors

Thunderbird Twin - Technical Talk Technical talk for the big Thunderbird twin

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-28-2009, 02:14 PM   #1 (permalink)
New Member
Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2
Fuel Economy/Range per tank?

I'm looking to buy a new t-bird, but I would like to know what kind of fuel economy/ range-per-tankfull I should expect from the big twin. The bike would be used mostly for touring purposes, so you can understand why this is important to me. I realize the bikes are hardly broken-in yet, but any info from the folks who have been out and about would be greatly appreciated.
pm1apj is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 08-28-2009, 05:31 PM   #2 (permalink)
Banned
SuperSport
Favourite Bike: '10 Thunderbird
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fayetteville NC
Posts: 1,042
I typically average a very consistent 40 mpg. I'm a big guy though and don't help things with my lack of aerodynamics and weight (6'6' 245). Others tend to average higher than me, more in the 43-45 range. If you are less of a circus freak than I am I would expect that sort of mileage.

Good luck on the purchase
Thatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2009, 05:42 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: L.A., Ca.
Posts: 8,846
Mine is weird. I can ride in town and get 35-38. But on the highway or in the twisties even riding pretty hard, i seem to always get 45-46 ! Yeah, i know thats a huge jump from as little as 35 to as high as 46, and i'm still trying to figure out whats going on. But even at high speeds on the freeway like 80 MPH i seem to still get 45. Like i said in another thread about this just today, it seems like the bike's Achilles's heel when it comes to gas mileage is acceleration from a stop like you do constantly riding in big cities like L.A. where i am. Those darn red lights seem to be what kills it's MPG. Then again, thats what i'm finding but others seem to range no more than 2-3 MPG difference between their high and low figures.

Last edited by dazco; 08-28-2009 at 05:44 PM.
dazco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2009, 08:51 PM   #4 (permalink)
New Member
Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2
That's great info....thanks very much. Those highway numbers are impressive. My experience has been that mileage tends to improve on brand new bikes after the first 4 or 5,000 miles when the bike settles in (rider too) and the engine wears away some of it's out-of-the-box tightness....maybe the around-town numbers will pick up then also.

Again, thanks for the information.....
pm1apj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2009, 10:23 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
SuperStock
Favourite Bike: 2010 Thunderbird -Blue/Wh
 
DOUBLEL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SLIDELL, LA USA, In The Eye of Hurricane Katrina
Posts: 224
I have just under 1,200 miles on the bike and I am consistently averaging 46-47 mpg. I am riding about 20% city and the remainder on rural highways and Interstate. Since I am Louisiana, there are no hills so it is all flat. And, I am 5'7'' 140lbs if that helps you compare anything!
DOUBLEL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2009, 10:33 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: L.A., Ca.
Posts: 8,846
DOUBLEL, can you tell me what your riding style is and the amount of stop lights in the cities where you typically ride? I really want to see if i can understand why i'm getting such low numbers in the city. I ride fairly hard i must admit, tho not a lot of redlining or such. But i do pull away very briskly at times and often up to 55-60 briefly if the moment seems safe. And in L.A. its quite jammed with traffic lights, often just a few hundred yards apart or much less in some places. I guess i should take it real easy for a tank and see whether it's my jackrabbit starts that account for about 10 MPG difference.
dazco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2009, 10:59 AM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
SuperSport
Favourite Bike: 2010 Triumph Thunderbird
 
engage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 1,022
I am consistently getting low to mid-forties. On trips, I tend to get 44-45 MPG. A bit over 2,000 miles on the bike now.
engage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 05:59 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
SuperStock
Favourite Bike: 2010 Thunderbird -Blue/Wh
 
DOUBLEL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SLIDELL, LA USA, In The Eye of Hurricane Katrina
Posts: 224
Dazco, the difference in mpg sounds like a lot to be just from city driving. I'm in a suburban area so I'm not dealing with too many lights. I don't "ride it like I stole it", but I hit it pretty good. You also have more twistys than I have here. My Daughter is in Santa Monica and I would love to ride some of those canyon roads. It is about as flat as you get here so maybe it is just the combination of more highways, flat roads, less stop lights, and a little less jack rabbit that is making the difference. What did you get on the Speedy? To compare, my America avg was about 43 consistently.
DOUBLEL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 06:52 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: L.A., Ca.
Posts: 8,846
Thats what i was figuring. We all chime in with our mileage and you wonder why one guy gets very little and another a lot more. Different areas, riding styles etc. I just checked again the other day and this time got 43 with a combination of city and some rural riding. So it's not bad. I supposed once i average all my talleys up i'd be doing as good as my speedmaster, and that ain't bad for a bike thats almost double the engine and 200 Lbs more.
dazco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 08:47 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
Supersport 600
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: colo springs
Posts: 194
Thumbs down Low fuel?

Last weekend the low fuel light came on and I kept going until the miles left B/4 you run out of gas said 22. I stopped and only could put in 4.4 gal and the tank should hold about 5.5. At the time I was on the HWY and was avg. 43 MPG so the numbers don't add up. Has anyone else had the same experience or is it just a bad adjustment on my bike? I guess it would be nice if it was a little closer.

Trapper
Trapper is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuel economy, something to try plodalong Twins Talk 6 08-04-2009 04:17 PM
Fuel Cat In Petrol Tank - Improved Economy robnobrakes Club Cafe' 1 05-28-2007 09:17 AM
Fuel Economy desertrat Twins Technical Talk 26 03-08-2007 01:36 AM
fuel economy bassspeed Trophy 5 10-12-2005 09:13 PM
fuel economy Daytona Deliberations 4 04-17-2004 09:43 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:42 AM.



Motorcycle News, Videos and Reviews
Kawasaki Forum Ducati Forum Harley Davidson Yamaha R1 BMW S1000RR Forum
Vulcan Forums Ducati Monster V-Rod Forum Yamaha R6 Kawasaki Z1000
Kawasaki ZX Forum Honda 600RR Harley Forum YZF-R6 Forum Sportbike Forum
Kawasaki ZX-10R Honda 1000RR Suzuki SV Yamaha FZ8 Can Am Spyder
Kawasaki KLR 650 Honda RC51 Suzuki V-Strom Star Motorcycles Aprilia Forum
Kawasaki Versys Honda Fury Suzuki GSXR Triumph Forum KTM Forum
Kawasaki EX-500 Honda Goldwing GSX-R Forum Triumph 675 Victory Forums

Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2