» Log in
User Name Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Password
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 1 Week Ago
bobbyg2470's Avatar
New Member
Production 125
Favorite Bike: 2005 Triumph Rocket III
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, Co
Posts: 10
Who is copying Who?
This thread is not meant to illicit any anger, just looking to see if anyone else noticed this comparison.

The new Rocket Touring looks similar to the Harley Road King. Triumph took away the dual headlights, which I thought helped make the bike stand out. They have added hard bags, which are nice and roomy.

On the other side Harley introduced the Fat Bob. They have dual head lights and wider tires.

I wonder if the two motorcycle giants were talking when they were planning these bikes.

Not complaing at all, I think both bikes look awesome in their own right. Just making an observation and wanted to see if anyone else noticed.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 1 Week Ago
krothnbrg's Avatar
Member
Grand Prix 125
Favorite Bike: Rocket III
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near Los Angeles
Posts: 38
Hey Bobbyg,
Triumph produced this model specifically to go after the Road King crowd. I took a look at it when I bought my R3 Standard. The new tourer has a smaller tank, narrower back-end, is longer and heavier that the standard. It did indeed go to a single headlight and they removed the tachometer and put the speedo on the tank. WHich is kind of cool but to have sacrificed the tach was a big mistake IMHO. They also used the same engine but has fewer HP and greater torque.

Cool stuff though, the hard bags are really nice and they come standard with the rear crash bars. The windscreen is a quick release type which is a huge bonus in my view.

All in all it's a nice bike but if I wanted a Road King I would have bought a Road King.

Cheers,
Karl
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 1 Week Ago
bobbyg2470's Avatar
New Member
Production 125
Favorite Bike: 2005 Triumph Rocket III
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, Co
Posts: 10
re: Who is copying Who?
Karl,
Didnt realize that there were that many changes to the new touring model. When I first saw the Rocket, it was the looks that initially caught my eye and then the specs that sealed the deal.
I guess if you consider the Rocket Touring is a different model and not a replacement for the Rocket classic, the world will still continue to spin.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 1 Week Ago
KingOfFleece's Avatar
Senior Member
Powerbike
Favorite Bike: 07 America
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 335
The new H-D was designed by a European designer.
The Triumph, in part, was designed after US focus groups gave feedback. One big item was the desire for a single light. The market speaks-plain and simple.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 1 Week Ago
Senior Member
Powerbike
Favorite Bike: R90/6 BMW
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Converse, LA
Posts: 341
If I could redesign the 08 bagger, I would have taken more styling clues from the Honda Valkerie and less from the Glide. Two big headlights shining through the batwing faring with highway lights and Corbine beetle bags (like) with top bag would still make the bike clearly a Triumph Rocket.

Naming the 08 Rocket touring - TOURING - is only a disappointment if Triumph does not take the next step and build the Luxury Touring bike to compete with Tour Glide, GoldWing and BMW LT.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 1 Week Ago
Senior Member
Supersport 600
Favorite Bike: Hayabusa & 05 Rocket III
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 193
Both bikes have alot to offer IMO.. I had a hard time giving up the RK for the Rocket so i kept them both..lol. The only draw back i see with the Rocket, finding a dealer when you need one. Harley dealers are around every corner and when your touring any distance it's good to know your just a few miles away from help.
Attached Images:
File Type: jpg IMG_1255.jpg (77.2 KB, 7 views)
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 1 Week Ago
Senior Member
Supersport 600
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 174
Yup their even copying HDs prices.
__________________
jack
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 6 Days Ago
Senior Member
250 Grand Prix
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NW Fla.
Posts: 109
HMMM I wonder what Chattanooga sells the Tourer for?? Not my cup of java. To note the bags only carry 15lbs vs much more for the Corbin's and 20lbs for the Leatherlykes
__________________
Speed-used as a tool,improves time
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 6 Days Ago
New Member
Production 125
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 5
Originally Posted by krothnbrg View Post

All in all it's a nice bike but if I wanted a Road King I would have bought a Road King.
"if I wanted a Road King I would have bought a Road King". Yep, me too. But I didn't. I wanted a Triumph Rocket Touring, so I bought that instead.

Why though? Well, ride a Road King and then ride an R3T, as I did, and that is all the explanation you need. Actually sit the two bikes side by side and then trying anyone with half decent vision that they look similar and you'll look a tad silly.

Yes, they both have hard luggage, and yes, they both have a single headlamp and tank consul and, erm, well that's it really.

It's a bit like sayinmg the QE2 looks like the Lucitania because they have the same number of funnels and are a similar shape (Actually dont know if that's true, but you get the picture).

There was no point in Triumph building another Standard or Classic clone, because they already exist. The full dress tourer is a design in the pipeline - and not what I would want. The R3T sits nicely in between and fulfills a requirement that clearly exists, judging by sales.

Why anyone would buy any HD in preference to a Triumph is beyond me. In terms of engineering, power, performance etc there just is no comparrisson. So to say, 'If I'd wanted a Road King, I'd have bought one' is over simplistic and ignores too many factors.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 6 Days Ago
New Member
Grand Prix 125
Favorite Bike: Rocket 3 Touring
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 26
At first I too was concerned about the 15 lb. limitation. Then I weighed the stuff I stick in the bags. With added tools (ratchet, sockets, allen wrenches etc), airman fuel pump, Stop-n-Go tire kit, and a bunch of other junk, I'm still well below the limit.

If you're packing for a trip and add bulkier things like clothes the weight is even less. My problem isn't with the weight limitation, its more with the placement of the latches to close the lid and the pockets for the tool kit and owners manual. They limit the available space.

I would rate the bags as adequate. I just ordered a Bikers Friend bag to supplement the capacity for anything beyond a few days. I do miss the full set of Jesse bags on my R1200GS. I could carry more stuff than I own in those things.
__________________
Harry

2008 R3 Touring
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
think you can ride - try copying this ozzyfzr Biker Hang-Out 15 02-05-2008 11:18 PM
Geek Corner - Ripping/Copying C.D.'s Archimedes Biker Hang-Out 20 01-22-2007 10:52 AM

 

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 PM.


Triumph Motorcycles - 100 Years

Triumph Logo © Triumph Motorcycles, Ltd.
TriumphRat.Net Logo and all Content © TriumphRat.Net
TriumphRat.Net is not affiliated in any way with Triumph Motorcycles Limited
Site operation and content is donated by Triumph Motorcycle Enthusiasts

Usage of this website, features, and all content within constitutes an agreement
with the Acceptable Use Policy and Privacy Statement.

Always Ride Safely and Within Your Limits


Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0