|
The main difference between the "12 minute tune" and the adaptations that the ECU makes on its own initiative during normal operation is mainly the time scale.
In daily service, the computer tends to assume the data it's receiving from the sensors are truthful. If it notices inconsistencies arising gradually over time, however--such as normal aging of sensors--it compensates for them with an internal recalibration over time as well.
If a sudden data anomaly arises, it first assumes that the information is real...that something in the bike's environment has actually changed; ie, you've ridden up a mountainside into thinner air, or a cold front has moved through, or whatever. In assuming the condition to be real, it will attempt to keep performance consistent through normal, accepted adaptations of fuel map and ignition timing. It may take a couple of operating cycles for it to realize the anomaly is persisting, that the performance compensations aren't working, and then try to adapt itself (which may not even be possible if the sensor is faulty enough, and is difficult to do anyway if the rider is operating the throttle).
The "12 minute tune" is generally a way of signalling the ECU that an intentional change has been made--you've replaced a sensor or made exhaust system mods or loaded a new tune or whatever--and you want it to go ahead and adapt without waiting to compare sensor input vs performance experimentally during operation.
In other words, the "12 minute tune" can't do anything for you beyond what normal operational adaptation will do, but it will cause it to happen sooner, at the time of your choosing--if there's any need for an adaptation at all. It's not anything that needs to be performed periodically.
__________________
John
|
Linear Mode
