Triumph Rat Motorcycle Forums banner

Oil level dip stick old and new

35K views 19 replies 14 participants last post by  MacBandit  
#1 ·
I know we all discussed this deeply back in the Spring but I had a chance to photograph the old and new dipstick side by side today and measure them. Also since then I've gotten to read the official Triumph bulletin detailing the release of the updated dipstick. So in order to put everything in one place for easy reference I'm creating this new thread. So here goes.

For those that are uninformed on this topic Triumph starting with the 09 Daytonas shortened the oil dipstick and therefore increasing the oil volume of the bike. There was a great deal of conjecture and assumptions made surrounding this change with many people believing that Triumph had altered the oil pan or internals of the bike in order to increase the oil capacity. The truth is far simpler. There were no internal changes and the oil pan is the same they simply shortened the oil dipstick in order to increase the oil volume. Triumph along with this change released bulletin detailing all this and simply stated that the oil dipstick is retrofittable and the oil level can be increased on all the older 675s but that there was no recommendation to do so.

I have been carefully following any mention of engine failures that I can find on the internet and have personally come to the conclusion that this should be made a mandatory change. It's not that it will affect 99% of the riders but for that 1% that rides track days does wheelies and in general pushes their bike to the limit it reduces the chances they are taking on incurring some form of engine damage from oil starvation. Even of those 1% there is no guarantee that doing any of the things mentioned could cause any damage at all but there is some chance so for that alone I think it's good protection at very little cost to the rider.

Of note Triumph implements production changes at any time of production and notes the changeover by vin number. So just because your bike is an '09 does not mean you have received the change. You will have to visually inspect the dip stick to be sure of what one your bike has.

The measurement differences are as follows as measured from the top sealing surface of the dip stick down to the level marks.

_____________Overall length
Old dip stick____90mm(3.54")
New dip stick___77mm(3.03")

Oil level marks____Full mark________Low mark
Old dip stick_______59mm(2.32")____78mm(3.07")
New dip stick______43mm(1.69")____62mm(2.44")

As you can see from the measurements and the image the high mark on the old dipstick is actually within a few mm of the low level of the old dip stick and the top of the hatch marks on the old dipstick is actually very close to the full mark on the new dip stick. I have been running my own bike at the top of the hatch marks and on street or track I have had no issues with this (as to be expected as per Triumphs own information). It is our own shop policy to either replace the old dip stick with the new one or to fill the bike to the fuller level on the old dip stick. We feel this is a service to our customers despite the information from Triumph saying it is unnecessary.

Image
 
#2 ·
Thanks Macb! I retrofitted the long stick to my 08 about 2 years ago when I first became aware of this. I puzzled it out and posted my guesswork on my uk home forum. My Striple has never used any appreciable amount of oil but I gather there have been quite a few Daytona riders reporting oil use.
It is a real benefit to the 675 community to have an authoritative source from you for this inexpensive and useful mod.
 
#4 ·
MacBandit - I consider myself pretty OCD when it comes to servicing my bike, and have always, from day one, have had trouble reading the level on that stupid dip stick. I know it has to do with the stick being located directly under the fill hole, where it is prone to collect drips from above, ect. and give a "false" reading. To be honest, it's extremely hard to tell any difference between 3.5 and 4 quarts when filling my bike. I know many others have the same difficulty reading the stick as well. I've tried the "filling on the side stand and tilting slowly trick", as well as many other ways to do it, all with less than confident results.
I think it would go a long way towards killing this beast once and for all if we knew that an oil & filter change could be simplified into something like:

1. Drain oil.
2. Remove filter.
3. Wait 10 minutes.
4. Install new, empty filter.
5. Dump 4 liters of oil into sump.
6. Done, NO NEED TO CHECK LEVEL.

If we didn't have to "guess" what the real level on that stick was, it would be a whole lot easier. Do you have a typical method like the above scenario?
 
#5 ·
No unfortunately I don't. As I typically do it strapped to a lift so it's level. Every bike drops a different amount of oil and each change can be different due to what position parts are in the motor at that time. Honestly what I do when I'm checking the oil is remove the dipstick wipe it down stand the bike up with one hand and balance it then screw the ship stick in and back out with the other. It sounds difficult but with some practice it's quite easy. As for anal there's no reason to be its not an exact process and you just need to be in the ballpark.
 
#7 ·
There was a great deal of conjecture and assumptions made surrounding this change with many people believing that Triumph had altered the oil pan or internals of the bike in order to increase the oil capacity. The truth is far simpler. There were no internal changes and the oil pan is the same...
Thank you MacBandit for this important posting.

When the second generation 675 was launched, the press at the time reported the larger sump. Maybe they were bamboozled by Triumph (actually Simon Warburton!), or maybe they saw the increased oil capacity on the new launch specs and assumed Triumph had increased the sump capacity by 0.5 litre. There were many stories at the time of engine failures and excess oil usage of the previous model after all. I remember some journo stating that the increased sump capacity was due to Triumph's experience in racing the 675!

You are of course correct I have just checked the Part No. for the sump on bikes from VIN 381275 (T1230008). It is exactly the the part no. for bikes up to VIN 381274.

Would I be correct therefore in assuming that the new dipstick will be good for pre-2009 Daytona 675's, i.e., from launch in 2006? Or alternatively, add 4 litres of oil to my 2007 675 and leave it at that -- as per the advice of Neanderthal?

Finally, do you have a part no. for the new condition dipstick?

Image
 
#8 ·
Okay, I have just found the edition of Tech News (#112). Here is a screen capture of the actual advisement:

Image


Strange though that Triumph recommend that "it is not necessary to replace older dipsticks and owners should continue to set their oil levels according to the dipstick that is fitted."

And yet the oil capacity will increase if the new condition dipstick is fitted.

Which is better? Less oil, possible engine failure. More oil: better protection against possible engine failure? Or is the extra oil capacity simply to provide a better reserve should the engine burn oil as some were doing?

Image
 
#13 ·
Reviving an old thread, but I recently got my '13 back from the dealer for the 500 mile service. I checked the oil after I went for a short ride in the cold (was hearing an ever so slight metallic tapping that I attributed to it being 30°F out, but wanted to check the oil just in case) and found that the oil had be filled all the way to the top of the hash marks. Could this cause any issues? Should I remove a bit of oil?
 
#15 ·
The difference is very slight. When faced with the same issue, I used a small (very clean) bit of tubing attached to a large syringe to draw the excess out of the dipstick hole. Worked like a charm and saved me the hassle, and potential mess of trying to either partially drain, or fully drain and refill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stevie19
#16 ·
First check the oil per Triumph's instructions in your manual. Run for 5 minutes then cool for 3. I've found that even shorter rides cause the oil to look overfilled on the dipstick but checking with the advised procedure shows normal levels. To half-ass a compromise I shoot for the second line on the dipstick (2/3 up the hash marks). None of this deals with the really confusing illustration in the manual which one would have thought Triumph could have cleared up by now.