|
I tend to agree with Ikonoklass -- as far as I know, Triumph is one of the few cycle manufacturers significantly increasing market share (BMW and Harley are the others). While the retro and cruiser areas are responsible for a large chunk of that, it's my understanding the US is widely considered a fairly un-tapped market on the sports bike side of the coin.
Another way to look at it from Triumph's perspective is that they likely haven't made back their R&D investment on the Daytona 600. If they do nothing else with the machine, their costs are now pretty much limited to continued manufacture, marketing and parts inventories -- all the tooling is done and needs to be paid for. It makes little sense to pull the plug on it now. My guess is they won't pursue the cutting edge of performance in the sports bike arena, but rather focus on sports bikes that are better suited to real world riding -- bikes that offer a unique riding experience and demand a slight premium in the marketplace, but for different reasons than, say, an R-1 or a Blade.
Ikonoklass has it right, I think, in relation to semi-nakeds. Seems most riders want a full standard, or something with more dress, rather than a bike in between.
Just my .02 cents...
[ This message was edited by: MattDaddy on 2004-03-17 11:50 ]
|