Part of that is the angle and the flash - makes The Gap look bigger than it is.
Here's a shot of the stock seat, actually taken well before I got the Sargent or The Gap debate started.
Note that the angle is not dead-on, but you can see The Gap. In fact, I'd bet that a directly horizontal angle, like the one in the photo Kuhlka's referencing, would show a similar gap on the stocker.
Here's a higher angle - the gap isn't as noticeable.
And if you're not lookin' for it, you probably wouldn't even see it.
I'm not sayin' there's no gap or that Sargent doesn't have some consistency issues when it comes to fit. The obviously do. Bkrbil's seat fit was HORRIBLE and I don't blame him for sendin' it back.
However, I'll stick by my main points:
[*] The Gap exists with the stock seat
[*] On mine, it's not noticeable unless you're lookin' for it
[*] Style preferences and comfort will vary widely between iindividual, and comments on such (including mine) should be considered with that subjectivity in mind (well, except for Nuclear Red - everybody agrees that sucks).
I find it comfortable. Others might not.
Actually, I'd encourage HiVel to try a Corbin and see if that suits him better. It might.
Doesn't matter to me if someone buys a Sargent or a Corbin. I don't own stock in either. Both make a good product (in fact, I have both brands) and both will customize your seat with different foam, custom shape, different covers, etc. - it's all a matter of how much you wanna spend and how long you're willing to wait.
[ This message was edited by: R100Pilot on 2006-07-25 08:10 ]