2005 Speed Triple Dyno #'s- stock, pipes, pipes&map

[littlefield]

I believe the latest TOR's map for the 05-06 is 20087.

[kuhlka]

Aerodynamics don't make THAT much of a different in the quarter mile. Even the Hayabusa's aerodynamics and ram-air intakes don't make much of a difference until it hits the 120+ range. We need someone with a PCIII on their new S3 to get some dyno runs in and a custom map with aftermarket race pipes.

[brettmess24]

I agree but we also need someone that knows how to tune the pc3 and run the dyno! This sort of black magic is hard to come by, and I don't mean any of the self proclaimed tuners.

[kevf]

On 2006-01-23 18:49, kuhlka wrote:
So then the torque numbers weren't total bs then, eh kev? Thats the same my bike got on the dyno.

Eh kuhlka you tell me if these are BS #'s. Motorcyclist Mag stock 03 S3 113.7 hp and 78.2 ft lbs. The torque seems high to me. Thats what your bike got stock????????????????

[beers2u]

Uhh...my comment about the "aerodynamic" rear on the '02-'04's was a joke.

Apparently, not a very good one... :wink:

[kuhlka]

No, I was agreeing to this comment;

"Motorcyclist had some BS rear wheel torque #'s listed for a 03 S3. I think they got 70 something ft lbs and 113 hp."

I got 113rwhp and 69 ft lbs. But, that was with a K&N filter, my TOR CF high mount can, and some basic Tuneboy fuel mapping.

That 78 number sounds more like what the 1050 SHOULD be getting at the rear wheel...

I suppose aerodynamics/drag might make a big difference if you've got a 160lb guy on a 955i and a 350lb lumberjack on the 1050, lol. I switched to the t595 tail section, so that must be why mine goes even faster. Now if I could just lose my 30lbs of gut, I'd be good to go.

[aaronb_dsn]

i should get my pcIII in this week, it has been on order since the 12th :evil: so hopefully i will be on the dyno with it. but i am having them remap my bike for the wolf race cans. i will make a run with the stock map and with the remap and post my results sunday!!! hopefully good numbers!

[TonUp]

On 2006-01-23 12:16, cheapbastard wrote:

I've never ridden a pre05 S3, but you'd think with the exta 10% cc's that the 1050 would definately be stronger. I have noticed though, that even mag tests, the 955 triples ran the 1/4 faster than the 1050's. Doesn't really make any sense, but I still love my 05! Anyone know why this is?

I had the 02 S3 making 112.6hp on the dyno, my 05 S3 feels much stronger. It is a lot torquier down low.

I think the new S3 is more wheelie prone during hard acceleration and it makes it slower on the 1/4 mile.

I love my 05 S3, it handles much better, corners way smoother and wheelies way easier.

Ton Up!

[nissn1]

On 2006-01-24 12:56, beers2u wrote:
Uhh...my comment about the "aerodynamic" rear on the '02-'04's was a joke.

Apparently, not a very good one... :wink:

aussies got it :-D

[cheapbastard]

Thanks Tonup, I was wondering about that myself. But I've always heard about the S3 being such wheelie bikes that I figured the 955 would've had the same problem in the 1/4. Anyways, sounds like the 1050 is definately stronger, just not as much as expected IMO. RbtWbbr3044 ended up with 118hp vs Kuhlka's 113hp without about the same mods. But I don't understand those torque #'s, but it doesn't really matter, because mine feels crazy strong down low and I love this thing!!! I'll probably run mine at the local dragstrip once this summer, just to see what she'll do. But since our track is only 1/8 mile, I have a feeling that my time will really suck, but atleast I'll look cool going thru the lights on the back wheel! :-D