» Log in
User Name Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Password
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-04-2007
Senior Member
Formula Extreme
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: State College, PA, USA
Posts: 532
Proven Setups - jetting etc.
The "what jets do I need?" posts are pretty common. The only hope the person has of getting a real answer is if someone who has had the same exact setup happens to reply to the post. That only puts them in the ballpark, but it's better than no information at all.

What these members are really looking for is a proven setup that works with the modifications they've made (or are thinking about making).

As much as I'd hate making it that easy for others after all the work I've put in (....copying Saigon5), I think we need a proven setups sticky (preferrably dyno-proven).

Alternatively, we could list what setups we've had that were at least rideable. That would be useful as far getting in the ballpark and identifying consistencies.

Or.....we could just club Jimmy900 and steal his records.


So what setups have worked (no major issues, explain the minor ones)?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-04-2007
Senior Member
Formula Extreme
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: State College, PA, USA
Posts: 532
(It would be nice to keep a consistent format, but to each their own)

Model: 2000 Thunderbird (standard)

Carbs: Keihin (Mikuni or Keihin)
Airbox: K&N in stock airbox w/ almost the entire back hacked out (will add photo later)
Exhaust: D&D 3 into 3
Cams: 955 Sprint
Ignitor: Stock, 8,700 redline IIRC

Main Jets: 137.5 (an earlier thread states 127.5, the tech misinformed me)
Needle: Factory Pro, center notch, two washers ON TOP of the needle to stiffen the spring? (done by the dyno tech)
Float Height: 17.5mm
Pilot Jets: 42 (switched to 40 after the dyno)
Air/Idle Screws: Varied (Dyno tech adjusted them)

Notes: I wouldn't call it a hot setup (I expected more power), but it worked. I put around 5,000 miles on the bike with this setup, including a 2,500 mile vacation. The line that goes scary lean at high RPM was the first run. A leaking carb rubber was the cause of it going lean at high RPM. They were of course, replaced for following runs. The improved fuel curve that still has the big dip at 5.5k, but doesn't go off the chart was the final setup. It probably could have been dialed in better with those components, but I moved on to a 3 into 1 pipe which changed everything.


Last edited by BadMouth : 09-04-2007 at 05:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2007
bkline's Avatar
New Member
Grand Prix 125
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Norristown, PA
Posts: 28
Model: 1996 Adventurer

Carbs: Mikuni
Airbox: K&N in stock airbox w/ 4 1.5" holes in the back
Exhaust: Thunderbike 3-into-1
Cams: Stock
Ignitor: Stock
Ignition Rotor: Factory Pro Ignition Rotor Advancer (+4 degrees)

Main Jets: 145
Needle: Dynojet, 2nd notch from the top
Float Height: 17.5mm
Pilot Jets: 40
Air/Idle Screws: 2.5 turns out

Notes: Haven't gotten around to the dyno yet, but pretty steady torque according to the butt dyno. It pulls so well now that I installed a 19T front sprocket. I was willing to trade a little torque for the lower revs on the highway. It's like adding a 6th gear.
__________________
1996 Cafe Adventurer Project
http://www.triumphrat.net/memberalbu.../14456/cat/500



Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2007
jimmyj900's Avatar
Senior Member
World SuperBike
Favorite Bike: Mutato -- 2K Adventurer
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Leander, Texas, USA
Posts: 2,273
Model: 2000 Adventurer (standard)

Carbs: Keihin CVK
Airbox: K&N in Trophy/Sprint filter box w/ 2x1.5" holes at bottom inlets.
No snorkels.
Pipes: Aftermarket (?) 3:1 with conical collector.
Manufacturer unknown, from 1998 Speed 3.
Muffler: DIY high flow.
Cams: Triumph 'blue' Sprint/Trophy
Ignitor: Stock 8,750 rpm

Setup T-43 (43rd setup since January 2007)

Main Jets: #130 Keihin
Needle: Factory Pro Titanium, clip on bottom notch
Float Height: 17.5mm
Pilot Jets: #38
Mixture Screws: ~ 2.5 turns
Slide port drilled to 3.0mm from stock 2.5mm

Butt Dyno Results:
Small throttle operation excellent. Smooth to 7000 rpm, no bucking or audible misfire. (#40 pilots caused misfire/weakness throughout range)

WOT -- Hot and Cold -- no misfires or bucking. (#125 mains caused misfire @ 4K rpm.)

Notes: Could feel thrust surges between 4-5 K and at approximately 6.5K indicating a lean mixture at 4K, rich mixture from 5K - 6.5K, and lean mixture over 6.5K rpm.

Thrust has substantially increased over the entire operating range and the zero to redline time in first gear has decreased substantially -- I estimate 1 to 2 seconds improvement.

A 0-60 mph test with my digital speedo read 3.5 seconds but that is unverified -- I need to check the speedo calibration with the GPS and verify the reading.

----------------------
UPDATE: The wire from the speedo sender unit came loose and dropped onto the ignition wires. That resulted in ignition pulses being added semi-randomly to the speed sensor pulses. That made my miles a lot shorter and my 0-60 time a lot less. I'll update again after I cal the speedo and verify it's accurate and consistent. Sorry 'bout that.
----------------------
UPDATE: Mileage: 10 Oct 07: I did a group ride last weekend with multiple gas stops and the mileage varied from 34 to 40 mpg (US) depending on riding conditions and speed. The multiple fuel stops were necessary due to a Sportster with a peanut tank.
----------------------
It's going to take a dyno run to see what the ultimate results of this configuration are.

Jim -- Senior AMD
__________________
My NEW Photo Album: http://s279.photobucket.com/albums/k...0Head%20Stuff/

Last edited by jimmyj900 : 10-10-2007 at 07:51 AM. Reason: Updated information...
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2007
funhunter63's Avatar
Senior Member
250 Grand Prix
Favorite Bike: 99 Thunderbird
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Salina, KS
Posts: 123
Other Motorcycle: 98 Trophy
Extra Motorcycle: 83 Goldwing
Model: 1999 Thunderbird (standard)

Carbs: Keihin CVK
Airbox: K&N in standard filter box w/ 5 x 1.5" holes
Pipes: Stock
Muffler: TORs
Cams: Stock
Ignitor: Stock

Main Jets: #120 Keihin
Needle: 1 0.020" needle under stock needle
Float Height: 17.5mm
Pilot Jets: #40
Mixture Screws: ~ 2.5 turns
Plugs: DPR7EA-9

Butt Dyno Results:
Small throttle operation good. Smooth to 7000 rpm, no bucking or audible misfire.

WOT test:
Starting @ 2000 RPM in 2nd gear-then WOT. It stutters or bogs for an instant until about 2500-3000 RPM, then it takes off....yippee...until I hit the 6500 RPM pipe restriction spot that only slows it down a little. Doesn't appear to make much difference whether it is hot or cold for this test. But today was a cool day here...didn't even get to 60. This is not something I would do in normal riding anyway. I am almost always over 3000 RPM.

Future thoughts and questions:
If I put another shim or two under the stock needle I think it would help the accelleration @ 70MPH in high gear @ 4000 RPM??? If I put Thruxton needles in, would I need to shim them??? What RPM range do the shim affect? What RPM range does the difference in the tapers between the Thruxton needle and the stock needle affect?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-14-2007
Ronkeli's Avatar
New Member
Production 125
Favorite Bike: 1996 Sweet Triple
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 10
Bike: 1996 Adventurer

Carbs: Keihin CVK
Airbox: K&N filter in stock box, one 1.5" extra hole right side (secondary box removed)
Exhaust: Thunderbike 3-1
Cams: Stock
Ignitor: Stock
Spark Plugs: NGK Iridium DPR9EIX-9

Main Jets: #115
Pilot Jets: #40
Needle: Stock with one shim (0.5mm)
Float Height: Stock (17.5mm)
Air/Idle Screws: ~2 turns out

Notes: (only butt dyno results)
- pulls harder than stock all rpm, especially low rpm torque is much better
- better throttle response (or only feels like it ?)
- pretty simple and mild setup, no heavily engine modifications
all in all, everything works really fine

Last edited by Ronkeli : 09-15-2007 at 04:18 AM. Reason: write mistakes, my bad language knowledge :-(
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-15-2007
jimmyj900's Avatar
Senior Member
World SuperBike
Favorite Bike: Mutato -- 2K Adventurer
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Leander, Texas, USA
Posts: 2,273
Originally Posted by funhunter63 View Post
WOT test:
Starting @ 2000 RPM in 2nd gear-then WOT. It stutters or bogs for an instant until about 2500-3000 RPM, then it takes off....yippee...until I hit the 6500 RPM pipe restriction spot that only slows it down a little. Doesn't appear to make much difference whether it is hot or cold for this test. But today was a cool day here...didn't even get to 60. This is not something I would do in normal riding anyway. I am almost always over 3000 RPM.

Future thoughts and questions:
If I put another shim or two under the stock needle I think it would help the accelleration @ 70MPH in high gear @ 4000 RPM??? If I put Thruxton needles in, would I need to shim them??? What RPM range do the shim affect? What RPM range does the difference in the tapers between the Thruxton needle and the stock needle affect?

The needles/needle jets supply a small amount of fuel at low rpms/small thottle from the straight section of the needles. The difference between needle straight diameter and needle jet inside diameter forms an annulus which is essentially a small orifice -- like a pilot or main jet. The velocity of the airflow determines how much fuel is 'drawn' into the airstream.

As the slide rises and the needle lifts, the tapered diameter of the needle starts interacting with the needle jet inside diameter and increases the area of the annulus which allows more fuel to be 'drawn' into the airstream. More lift on the slide means a decrease in needle diameter due to the taper and more fuel flows.

So.... If the slide isn't lifting enough or the needle taper starts too late (straight section too long) then you're going to experience a lean WOT mixture at low rpms.

At part throttle the lean operation can be masked (swamped) by oversize pilot jets and large mixture screw openings, but at WOT those options are essentially bypassed (due to low airflow velocity) and the needle taper effects become dominant.

The Thruxton needles are virtually identical in configuration to the FP needles with the clip on the bottom notch. In this configuration the needle head to taper distance is around 2mm shorter than the stock needles, so the tapers start acting with 2mm less slide lift than the stock needles -- much sooner.

I've found that it's the needle taper distance (from the head to the start of taper) that is critical to WOT operation in the 3000-4000 rpm range and that the effect is most pronounced at 4000 rpm with a modified air intake. Longer cams exacerbate the problem because the increased duration of the cam generates a lower velocity through the carb and doesn't open the slide as far -- spreading the cylinder fill over a greater time period means the cylinder doesn't have to fill as fast.

Shimming the needle effectively shortens the distance from the needle head to the start of the taper, but stacking 2mm of shims under the stock needle is not a good idea. The needle tends to 'wobble' more and will contact the needle jet and that may cause it to jam and bounce. Stuck or bouncing needles don't run well...

The Thruxton needles are less expensive than the FP needles, so that makes them worth a try, but be sure to check the pricing on both. With the value of the dollar down against the Euro, the FP needles might be a good value in terms of adjustability and price differential.

Shimming the Thruxton needles should be unnecessary. I tried a 0.5mm shim with the FPs and it was way too rich at low rpm to the point of misfire and bucking. When that didn't work I opened up the slide vacuum port from 2.5mm to 3.0mm. I don't recommend that except as a last resort with the bigger cams, but it is reversable with a judicious application of expoxy and re-drilling.

Does all this make sense?

Jim
__________________
My NEW Photo Album: http://s279.photobucket.com/albums/k...0Head%20Stuff/
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-16-2007
Senior Member
SuperStock
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 281
Bike: 1999 Legend
Carbs: Keihin CVK

I've been through a bunch of set-ups (long-time AMD)... starting with the oldest:
August 2004
Mains: 120
Pilots: 40
Factory Pro needles 3rd clip
4x 1-1/2" holes in the airbox
Triumph 'Off-Road' Pipes

Max RWHP: 74.1*
View dyno chart

January 2007
Mains: 130
Pilots: 40
Factory Pro Needles 4th clip
Pod filters**
Custom 3-1 pipe

Max RWHP: 74.87
Max Torque: 51.96
First run with Pod filters replacing the modified airbox, and the new 3-1 custom pipe. Slight HP improvement, but look at the big lean spot at 4K
View dyno chart

June 2007
Mains: 130
Pilots: 40
Factory Pro Needles 5th clip (highest position)
Pod filters
T509 speed triple cams
Custom 3-1 pipe

Max RWHP: 86.98
Max Torque: 56.95
First try with the T509 cams. BIG top-end horsepower boost, but also a BIG lean spot at 4K RPM, leading to a BIG hole in the power band, and an actual HP decrease from previous between 5.5-6.5K RPM
View dyno chart

August 2007
Mains: 126
Pilots: 40
Factory Pro Needles 5th clip (highest position)
Pod filters
T509 speed triple cams
Custom 3-1 pipe

Max RWHP: 84.7
Max Torque: 55.63
This was where I had the bike professionally dyno-tuned. In addition to the jetting tweaks, the mechanic modifed the pipe to get better backpressure, which really helped the huge lean spot you can see at 4K RPM. He lengthened slightly one of the collector pipes, and added a small second baffle to another. Made a huge improvement in the way the bike runs. It still runs a bit lean at 4K, probably on account of the needles (see Jimmy's post above) but overall it feels great - no bogging, no stuttering, and major improvements in acceleration and top-end... feels much better on the highway now, almost like having a 6th gear
View dyno chart

HTH somebody...

*Note: all HP & Torque numbers are uncorrected... since I don't have the corrected #s for each run, figured I'd stick with an apples-to-apples comparison.

**Pod Filters... there are lots of opinions out there, I can only speak to my experience. I've never had any trouble with them in the rain, and I've ridden through some downpours (though I've never ridden them for more then 2-3 hours in the rain). I do have DIY carb brace (pics) and i wouldn't trust just the carb rubbers to keep everything together, personally. Jetting with them wasn't any harder then jetting for a drilled-out airbox. Others have had more issues, maybe I just got lucky. The filters I'm using are K&Ns with Jack Lilley aluminum adapters to attach them.
__________________
~Crosstie

'99 Speed Legend Retro Cafe Streetfighter

Last edited by crosstie : 09-22-2007 at 07:55 PM. Reason: pods
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2007
Senior Member
Formula Extreme
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: State College, PA, USA
Posts: 532
Great info Crosstie.

Thanks for sharing it with us.


Here's my FINAL setup. No dyno, but I put about 700 miles on it this weekend and I'm completely satisfied with everything except the small throttle/low RPM operation.

Model: 2000 Thunderbird (standard)

Carbs: Keihin CVK
Airbox: K&N in stock airbox w/ almost the entire back hacked out (will add photo later)
Exhaust: Thunderbike 3 into 1
Cams: 955 Sprint
Ignitor: 95 Speed Triple, 9,700 redline IIRC
Advance: Factory Pro Ignition Advance Rotor +4 degrees

Main Jets: 140
Needle: Factory Pro, center notch
Float Height: 17.5mm
Pilot Jets: 40
Air/Idle Screws: 2 turns (plan on experimenting more when I buy the tool)

Notes: It was dyno'd a few days earlier at 84.6 rwhp with the following differences: 142.5 mains & needles on 4th notch down. With that setup, it was slightly rich across the board with a big, very rich spot at 5.5k.

Last edited by BadMouth : 09-17-2007 at 06:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2007
ShikePoke's Avatar
Senior Member
250 Grand Prix
Favorite Bike: '01 Legend TT
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 140
Other Motorcycle: I can have two?
I do not have a dyno run to post yet, but inspecting the plugs, and the thrill of the ride is enough proof for me, I have a 2001 Legend TT.

Keihin carbs:
128 Mains.
Stock Needles with one shim each.
38 Pilots @ 3.25 turns, got the 40's on the way, but idles fine, not much pop on decel.
Emgo pod filters.
Speed Triple rubbers, open.
Slip on aftermarket with baffle removed. Stock headers.

The intake note and exhaust note make music on WOT. Never heard a bike before or since like the triple opened up!

Poke
__________________
ShikePoke - "Hated to kill the boy...but he needed to be taught a lesson..."
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jetting Whitehurst Club Cafe 4 12-24-2007 04:07 AM
D&D Jetting technogrunt Twins Technical Talk 6 03-01-2007 07:57 AM
JETTING HELP?!?!? Brooksie Twins Technical Talk 4 01-05-2007 01:07 PM
How about a member list of tuning setups? dazco Triumph Twins HangOut 9 07-28-2005 06:51 PM
possible setups Modifications & Workshop Talk 11 09-01-2003 02:42 PM

 

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 AM.


Triumph Motorcycles - 100 Years

Triumph Logo © Triumph Motorcycles, Ltd.
TriumphRat.Net Logo and all Content © TriumphRat.Net
TriumphRat.Net is not affiliated in any way with Triumph Motorcycles Limited
Site operation and content is donated by Triumph Motorcycle Enthusiasts

Usage of this website, features, and all content within constitutes an agreement
with the Acceptable Use Policy and Privacy Statement.

Always Ride Safely and Within Your Limits


Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0