» Sponsors
Motorcycle.com

» Sponsors

Hinckley Classic Triples 885cc Classic Styled T3's: Legend, Thunderbird, Thunderbird Sport & Adventurer.

PakBikes.net
Please Visit our Site Sponsors

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-19-2007   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
250 Grand Prix
Favorite Bike: 99 Thunderbird
 
funhunter63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Salina, KS
Posts: 135
Other Motorcycle: 98 Trophy
Extra Motorcycle: 83 Goldwing
I think all the thunderbirds, legends, and adventurers have 7/8" bars. Some have more rise that others. I would think that the grips would interchange. Some model changes on the adverturer were wheel size, locking seat becoming non-locking later. Not all the sissy bars/rack are compatible even between the early/late adventurers. I am not sure if the turn signals changed.

MPG will depend on your right wrist. Bad MPG is fun! I have a friend that has an adventurer that gets 45 or better cruising down the road. The worst I have gotten on my Thunderbird is 35, but it was fun (can't seem to control that wrist). I think with lots of self control I would get 45 or better.


__________________
If it hurts, quit doing that.
funhunter63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 04-19-2007   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
World SuperBike
Favorite Bike: Mutato -- 2K Adventurer
 
jimmyj900's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Leander, Texas, USA
Posts: 2,414
Quote:
I have the Haynes manual for '91-'99 but my '99 Thunder bird has the Keihin carbs. Does that mean the manual is incorrect for my bike? Are the Keihin carbs better or easier to adjust?

How much torque and RWHP do you think I am getting from my Thunderbird with aftermarket exhaust now (just guessing of course)? I know they have adjusted the air screws probably when they put the exhaust on.
My Haynes shows both carbs and I think it was '98 that the change was made from Mikuni to Keihin, so you should be covered. Turn the page maybe? :-D

My personal opinion is that the Keihin is a better made carb since there's much less plastic and less slide/needle wear, but the Mikuni is supposed to be more flexible for tuning. I haven't worked on the Mikunis so I can't verify the last.

By 'aftermarket exhaust' do you mean the pipes from the engine or just the mufflers? If it's just the mufflers then there's no difference in peak power over the stock engine at about 60 RWHP.

If you've got a complete aftermarket exhaust system it's impossible to tell what the RWHP is without some dyno time.

I'd also point out that peak horsepower is a poor measure for determining the rideability of the bike. The real issue is how flat the torque curve is over the normal operating range.

Jim

[ This message was edited by: jimmyj900 on 2007-04-19 21:22 ]
__________________
CAUTION: This post may have been altered and critical safety information deleted without the permission or knowledge of the author.
jimmyj900 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2007   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
World SuperBike
Favorite Bike: Mutato -- 2K Adventurer
 
jimmyj900's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Leander, Texas, USA
Posts: 2,414
Quote:
OK, another question. When looking for replacement parts, i.e., bars, grips, lights, etc., is there are there major differences in the years that bike was made. IOW, will a 99 turn signal work on my 96?

And another thing, how many MPG should I be getting assuming stock everything? No gas guage and no idea how many miles to expect.
There were some changes made in 1998 or 1999 so a lot of the 'trim' parts won't be the same as the earlier models.

Bike Bandit has a set of Triumph parts breakdowns online, so I'd recommend cross checking the part numbers for the various years you're looking at.

Bike Bandit uses their own part numbers, so don't take them to the dealers to order parts. :-D


Mileage should be somewhere around 40miles per US gallon. I've gotten as little as 32 and as much as 45. It depends on the accessories and how you ride. I got the 32 mpg with a big windshield on an 80 mph higway, and I've gotten 45+ on secondary roads at 50 mph and below.

I'm averaging around 42 mpg with mods, so you should do better with a stock bike.

Jim
__________________
CAUTION: This post may have been altered and critical safety information deleted without the permission or knowledge of the author.
jimmyj900 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Adventurer for a newbie? patton Hinckley Classic Triples 14 01-24-2008 07:15 PM
Triumph Adventurer photo post bung1 Hinckley Classic Triples 7 11-19-2007 07:17 AM
saddlebags for 1998 Triumph Adventurer ravengrrrrl Hinckley Classic Triples 0 06-05-2006 04:43 PM
New to Triumph (Adventurer 97) Advice please! tango_jd Hinckley Classic Triples 9 03-11-2006 08:34 AM
Newbie here, Adventurer performance question legalese77 Hinckley Classic Triples 7 11-03-2005 10:37 PM


Motorcycle News, Videos and Reviews
Harley Davidson Suzuki GSXR Honda 600RR Yamaha R6
Sportbike Forums GSXR Forum Honda 1000RR Yamaha R1
Sportbikes Forum Ducati Forum Kawasaki ZX R6 Forum
Motorcycle Forum Ducati Monster Kawasaki Forum R1 MessageNet

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0