I took a test ride on a beautiful '99 Adventurer yesterday and really liked the bike except for one thing. The distance between the seat and footpegs was so short that my legs felt cramped. I've found a '00 Legend for about the same price but can't look at it for a couple of days and was wondering if the two bikes share the same ergonomics? Can anyone here clue me in? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I believe the Legend has a slightly longer peg to seat distance but I doubt it would make a LOT of difference. Other than that and the bend of the bars I'd say they are pretty close.
I really didn't notice much difference between the two except that the Adventurer was much more comfortable to flat foot. Then again I'm all of 5'7" on a good day with a 30"inseam so your experience may vary :wink:
Of course I'm baised but I like the cosmetics of the Adventurer more even if finding accessories is near impossible unless you improvise (1999-2001).
[ This message was edited by: RGBueller on 2004-07-22 12:20 ]
I ride a legend and have had a few spins on the thunderbird and adventure.
the legend does sit lower which at 5'7" I am flat footed at a stop.the legend has a 5 speed gearbox and if I remember right the others have a 6 speed.
when I bought my legend I could have bought anyone of the bikes in the triumph line.I just fell inlove with the green paint on the legend.
pete