» Insurance
» Sponsors
Trident-Exhausts.comBikeBandit Soupy's PerformanceMotorcycle.com Classifieds!Motorcycle.comCommonwealth MotorcyclesSportbikeTrackGearAnnitori DistributingJardineProducts.com
» Sponsors

Daytona Deliberations For owners and riders of Daytona 900, 955, 1000 & 1200

Please Visit our Site Sponsors Page

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-25-2004   #1 (permalink)
Member
Super Sidecars
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: California
Posts: 55
Yet, kept it for the model year on the Centinnel Edition, then brought back again in 2003? I just got a 2002 with the dual swing arm, and must admit I am a bit jealous of the SSSA models? It is a distinctive piece especially in the current all black "SE" model.

In 2002, the 955i Daytona also has a narrower rear wheel and "180" section width tire. The reviews I've read say this was for weight savings and slightly improved handling; probably less costly too. So why did Triumph bring the SSSA back in 2003 and continue on into 2004 as a standard feature?
dsinned is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 06-25-2004   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
SuperStock
Favourite Bike: '03 Speed Four (RIP)
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New York/New Jersey
Posts: 207
Other Motorcycle: 2000 Honda VFR (in yellow thank you very much)
Extra Motorcycle: '96 Katana 750
They brought it back for all the reasons you are "jealous".

A double sided swingarm usually (if not always) weighs less, and is a better "piece". You are correct, there is a cost savings (to them) as well.

As to rear tires, a wider tire can take more abuse (torque) but does, at the nth degree, slow steering.
__________________
Sometimes being an adult means recognizing what it is you want... and running like hell in the opposite direction.
sangsters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2004   #3 (permalink)
ratster
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
DSSA is better from an engineering perspective. Less weight. More stability. Granted, the SSSA is a bit sexier. That is the only reason they brought it back. Consumers wanted the SSSA. Call me a slave to practicality, but I'll take my 2002 with the DSSA any day.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2004   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
250 Grand Prix
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kettering OH
Posts: 124
Quote:
On 2004-06-27 00:54, ratster wrote:
Call me a slave to practicality, but I'll take my 2002 with the DSSA any day.
Practicality? The SSSA makes adjusting the chain and removing the rear wheel much easier. The "advantages" of a DSSA for a road bike pale in comparison.
blue885 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2004   #5 (permalink)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
On 2004-06-27 21:49, blue885 wrote:
Quote:
On 2004-06-27 00:54, ratster wrote:
Call me a slave to practicality, but I'll take my 2002 with the DSSA any day.
Practicality? The SSSA makes adjusting the chain and removing the rear wheel much easier. The "advantages" of a DSSA for a road bike pale in comparison.
Perhaps practicallity isn't the right word, functionality is better. IMO the single sided swingarm is passe (although I do think it looks sharp). In 2002 they were trying to make the bike more competitive with the Japanese bikes (thus the lighter, and more rigid DSSA), but realized it was the distinctivness that sold the bike, not performance (relative to the Japanese liter bikes) so they took a step back to the SSSA to please the customer base.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2004   #6 (permalink)
Member
Supersport 400
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 82
It's just that much sexier wwith the SSSA. Especially with my Black Widow undertail. :razz:
__________________
<center><img height="" src="http://www.bayarearidersforum.com/forums/avatar.php?userid=5923"

RogerK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2004   #7 (permalink)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It took me months to find a dssa and i grabbed it when i found it.I believe the handling benefits to be worthwhile and the 02 will become a rare classic
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2004   #8 (permalink)
Member
Super Sidecars
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Vinemont Alabama USA
Posts: 80
I wanted the DSSA initially for racing purposes. I haven't gone racing, but I'm not dead yet either. Yes, the SSSA does look cool and those under-seat exhaust are wicked. I also agree that the DSSA will become a bit more sought after as time goes on but this "BIG Tire" thing is somewhat Freudian.

iggi
Iggi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2001 or 2002 Triumph TB? triumph4ever Hinckley Classic Triples 9 05-21-2007 02:12 PM
2002 Triumph Daytona CE Toolkit stephenjpauls Daytona Deliberations 3 05-12-2007 07:07 AM
2002 triumph daytona ? rider955i Maintenance & Workshop Talk 0 04-12-2007 01:16 PM
2002 Triumph America b717doc Twins Talk 6 10-07-2005 09:00 AM
1999 SSSA fit on a 2002 DSSA??? bssofro Daytona Deliberations 3 01-20-2004 01:09 AM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0