|
|
» Main Menu |
|
Discussion Forums
Features
Motorcycle.com Links
Contribute
Motorcycle Forums
|
|
| Cruisers - America, Speedmaster Cruiser chat for America and Speedmasters |
 |
|
 |
09-27-2012, 02:51 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Grand Prix 250 Main Motorcycle: 2010 Triumph Speedmaster
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 59
|
Are Americas and Speedmasters REALLY that different.
G'day guys,
looking at buying a Speedmaster and rode both the America and the Speedy the other day at a dealer.
I was absolutely stunned at how much I didn't enjoy the America and surprised at the stupid grin I got from riding the Speedmaster.
Now, the reason for the dislike of the America was probably the aftermarket pipes they had, because they were actually pretty annoying rather than being "lumpy". And the windshield caused both mine and my daughters helmets to nearly vibrate off on the freeway BUT....the Speedmaster actually felt like a whole different bike - I didn't want to give it back.
I had a Harley for a while, and now an old Kawasaki - I know I want a Speedmaster. I love the look and the feel of it.
So....are they generally that much different to ride or was mine a "once off". I don't even look at Americas now (to consider buyin), whereas before I rode that one I figured a decent America was as good as a Speedy.
Peter
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
09-27-2012, 04:41 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Supersport 600
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 189
|
The fundamental difference between the two is the handlebar set up, and this obviously has a huge effect on the riding position.
Everything else is cosmetic.
If you find a good America for sale then you could always fit new bars and risers.
Sent from my Motorcycle iPhone app
|
|
|
09-27-2012, 08:13 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Powerbike Main Motorcycle: 2011 America
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North western Illinois
Posts: 360
|
Its a very personal decision. When I was considering buying a new bike in 2011, I sat on the America, Speedmaster, and Bonneville. For me, the seating position on the America was by far the most comfortable. I ended up buying a 2011 America Touring model (with the windshield, leather bags, passenger backrest and luggage rack) which is set up like the 2010 model. The wider handlebars, for me, is more comfortable and feels like it makes turning easier than the more tucked in newer handlebars. I do agree about the stock windscreen, which created unacceptable (to me) wind noise and turbulence, but after upgrading to a Clearview screen I was happy. Performance wise there is little difference I believe between the America and Speedmaster since they share the same engine and basic set-up. This is my first Triumph and I have been extremely happy with it. I worried about power from this smallish engine, but I have no trouble getting away from stoplights ahead of all the cars, and can comfortably ride the highway two-up at 75+ so I am satisfied.
|
|
|
09-27-2012, 09:30 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Formula Extreme Main Motorcycle: 2011 Speedmaster
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 520 Other Motorcycle: '07 Honda VLX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ru55boy
The fundamental difference between the two is the handlebar set up, and this obviously has a huge effect on the riding position.
Everything else is cosmetic.
If you find a good America for sale then you could always fit new bars and risers.
Sent from my Motorcycle iPhone app
|
+1
I wasn't aware of how much a handlebar set could affect the way a bike could handle OR contribute to the rider's comfort, but it does.
Short as I am (32" sleeve length), my arms are just long enough to effect relatively sharp turns, but a bit short for u-turns from a complete stop.
|
|
|
09-27-2012, 09:44 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Supersport 600
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 189
|
You should try my current set up of 8" chump bars over the 5" Speedmaster risers...
Much slower to turn in and requires effort and concentration. But, very comfortable and really straightens your back!
A little extreme but demonstrates the versatility of our bikes.
Sent from my Motorcycle iPhone app
|
|
|
09-27-2012, 09:46 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Supersport 600
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 189
|
Duplicate post deleted, d'oh.
|
|
|
09-27-2012, 10:01 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Grand Prix 250 Main Motorcycle: 2010 Triumph Speedmaster
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 59
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vito
Its a very personal decision. When I was considering buying a new bike in 2011, I sat on the America, Speedmaster, and Bonneville. For me, the seating position on the America was by far the most comfortable. I ended up buying a 2011 America Touring model (with the windshield, leather bags, passenger backrest and luggage rack) which is set up like the 2010 model. The wider handlebars, for me, is more comfortable and feels like it makes turning easier than the more tucked in newer handlebars. I do agree about the stock windscreen, which created unacceptable (to me) wind noise and turbulence, but after upgrading to a Clearview screen I was happy. Performance wise there is little difference I believe between the America and Speedmaster since they share the same engine and basic set-up. This is my first Triumph and I have been extremely happy with it. I worried about power from this smallish engine, but I have no trouble getting away from stoplights ahead of all the cars, and can comfortably ride the highway two-up at 75+ so I am satisfied.
|
I've always liked the "look" of the Speedmaster (and America). You can't beat it in my opinion.
Mind you, I too was a little dubious about the motor.....I mean and 865 on a cruiser when everything else seems to have some whopping behemoth. Then I read some motorcycle articles questioning whether we really need these huge engines in bikes. then - after riding the other day - I came to the conclusion that the 865 feels just right for me. It was great. I had the 1600 in my Softail, and whilst it was a great bike, I simply don't need that kind of thing.
Nope.....a black and white Speedmaster is out there somewhere with my name on it. I'll just bide my time.

Peter
|
|
|
09-27-2012, 01:29 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Formula Extreme Main Motorcycle: Speedmaster 2004
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The First State
Posts: 445
|
I bought Speedy instead of America. The reason is dual disk front brake. Changing the handle bar is easier than upgrading to the dual disk. Thus is the reason of buying the Speedy.
YMMV
|
|
|
09-27-2012, 04:49 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Grand Prix 500 Main Motorcycle: Triumph America
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 114
|
I remember looking at both when I was looking at buying one or the other. In the end, the subtle differences led me to get the one that gave me the best deal, and I landed with an America.
Granted, i have an 06, but this is a good article: http://www.bikepoint.com.au/reviews/...-america-23012
|
|
|
10-01-2012, 08:46 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
New Member
Grand Prix 125 Main Motorcycle: 2012 Triumph Speedmaster
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 28
|
I guess I will point out the obvious then lol
the front fork and wheel are different on the two. Both are "chunkier" on the America
and just an update the 2011-12 speedmasters have single disk up front. I was a little bummed on that. like why go from 2 disks to 1?
But you know I find the braking suffficient for this bike and the riding I do.
Just my 2 cents
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
Advertisement
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|