|
|
» Main Menu |
|
Discussion Forums
Features
Motorcycle.com Links
Contribute
Motorcycle Forums
|
|
| Classic, Vintage & Veteran For Coventry and Meriden Models. Anything pre-Hinckley goes. |
 |
|
04-21-2009, 12:31 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
SuperBike Favourite Bike: '68' T120 Bonneville
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: corpus christi, texas
Posts: 1,721 Other Motorcycle: 2006 T100 Bonneville Extra Motorcycle: '79' T140 street tracker
|
Sagging forks.
My '68' T120 seems to have a bit too much fork sag. I measured the springs when I had the forks apart and they were in spec length wise. I have no way of measuring the rate. I'm getting over two inches of sag from static (frontwheel off the ground) to weighted (me sitting on the bike). I weigh around 140 lbs. Does that sound to be in the normal range for these oldsters or is it a bit too much. I feel like I'm riding down hill and would like to raise it up a bit.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
04-21-2009, 01:46 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Powerbike Favourite Bike: 1976 Triumph T-140V
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 358 Other Motorcycle: 1950 Matchless G80 Extra Motorcycle: Yamaha 1200
|
Progressive Springs
Your bike is a 1968 model that makes your springs over 40 years old. The metal has fatigued. If it was a car you'd have swapped them out a long time ago. You could try and do all kinds of things with them but the real solution is to put in a set of progressive fork springs. They aren't expensive and they perform much better than the originals even when they were new.
Garanteed, you'll be asking yourself, why didn't I do this as long time ago?
|
|
|
04-21-2009, 04:02 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
SuperBike Favourite Bike: '68' T120 Bonneville
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: corpus christi, texas
Posts: 1,721 Other Motorcycle: 2006 T100 Bonneville Extra Motorcycle: '79' T140 street tracker
|
It is a '68' but I don't know how old the springs are. The PO had installed internal springs to supplement the external springs the bike came with because he weighs over 300lbs. I think he put new externals on then too I but can't confirm it. I'm not disputing you, just mulling the possibilities here but it seems that if the metal had fatigued, they would have collapsed some and wouldn't measure the correct length. Can a spring loose its spring rate (stiffness) an maintain its rebound length? I don't know. Progressive springs could be the cure I'm looking for though. Do you know of any sources that do the progressive external springs for these old bikes?
|
|
|
04-21-2009, 04:20 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Formula Extreme
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: france
Posts: 919
|
Many, if not the majority of bikes are ridden with too hard front springs. Many run topped out, which means when you ride over a dip in the road, the wheel has to fly because there is no movement left for the forks to track the surface. Not only that , hard springs give a harsh ride. I do not say your springs are not worn, but they have to have the ability to track the ground so do not be tempted to load up the spring rate so your are topping out. The other thing to watch is again, many people over damp the forks, thus preventing them again from tracking the road surface.
You want your suspension to be able to move quickly or you will have a lot less contact with the road.
Re the downhill feel, just check your rear suspension has not also been 'hardened'.
__________________
A wise man learns from his mistakes..
A genius learns from other peoples mistakes.
|
|
|
04-21-2009, 05:41 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
SuperBike Favourite Bike: '68' T120 Bonneville
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: corpus christi, texas
Posts: 1,721 Other Motorcycle: 2006 T100 Bonneville Extra Motorcycle: '79' T140 street tracker
|
Panda, the rear shocks are new (after market but new. stock length.) and set to the lightest setting. I was wondering if 2" was the "normal" sag for stock suspension with a lightweight such as myself aboard. I am running 190cc's of 20 wt. Belray in each leg so it shouldn't be 'over dampened'. I was considering adding some oil or going to the next heavier oil to stiffen it a bit as it nearly bottoms out when hard braking is applied.
|
|
|
04-22-2009, 04:30 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Formula Extreme
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: france
Posts: 919
|
It does sound as if your springs are weak, but try a standard set, and only go to stronger ones if you are absolutely sure you need it.
Also look over the forks, I found one 650 running on filed down big washers for 'bearings'. It can be scary seeing what some folks will do. (this was done by a 'professional garage').
I fitted new standard springs to my BMW, and to be truthfull, they are too hard and will top quite easily, yet many on the bmw forum advocate using stronger springs ?? I am not light either being about 90 kilos.
__________________
A wise man learns from his mistakes..
A genius learns from other peoples mistakes.
|
|
|
04-22-2009, 07:18 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Formula Extreme Favourite Bike: 1959 bonneville
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Rotorua, New Zealand
Posts: 794
|
Jimmy bush I don't think your forks are nearly the same as mine, But I would look at three things.
Firstly the original fork springs can be re tensioned by a spring smith even though they measure the same. If you are satisfied they are okay, reuse them.
Secondly what type of oil have you got in them? There may have been an oil leak or when you filled them you may not have put the correct quantity or grade of oil in. You can of course use thicker grade oil. I know many of the older guys do this to overcome the problem.
Thirdly increase the volume by say 20% then try it. If it works great, if it's too stiff using a syringe at the drain plug to measure and draw off the oil in small equal amounts from each fork and then tested.
Your problem is most likely the quantity and oil grade. Also use a syringe to fill the forks with oil. You may also have slightly different fork. Check the year models around you bike to see what volume and grade oil these bikes have. I.e. 1967 -1969 there may have been a small change.
|
|
|
04-22-2009, 08:34 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
World SuperBike Favourite Bike: The one between my legs
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 2,232 Other Motorcycle: '76 Triumph T140V Extra Motorcycle: '66 Triumph T120R
|
If you want to measure your spring rate, make up a rig with a rod attached to a base to keep the spring straight but will allow it to slide as it collapses. A piece of threaded pipe and a flange screwed to a board will do the trick. Then rig a lever that will allow you to compress the spring. Now, put your base/rod rig on a bathroom scale, slide the spring over the rod and slowly compress the the spring until you just get the coils to all touch. It is just at the point of touching that you read the scale and this is the spring rate. Helps to have two people to do this. You can only do this on for a fixed rate spring. If you keep pressing down after the coils touch the scale will continue to climb giving you a false reading.
regards,
Rob
|
|
|
04-22-2009, 08:50 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
SuperBike Favourite Bike: '68' T120 Bonneville
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: corpus christi, texas
Posts: 1,721 Other Motorcycle: 2006 T100 Bonneville Extra Motorcycle: '79' T140 street tracker
|
I changed nearly the complete front fork assemblys after I took them apart because they were trashed. I have new stanchions, bushings, restricters, shuttle valves, seals, damping sleeves, gaiters, and l/h lower. The only thing not new is the r/h lower, the dust excluder sleeve nuts, spring abutments, cork washers, and Springs. As per my shop manual, I put 190 cc's of Belray 20 wt in each leg. I thought fork oil viscosity and volume only affected the damping. Changing it won't change the sag will it? I know it needs some sag so it doesn't top out, I still haven't found out what sag it should have. It just seems like 2" is a bit much.
|
|
|
04-23-2009, 12:47 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Formula Extreme Favourite Bike: 1959 bonneville
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Rotorua, New Zealand
Posts: 794
|
jimmy bush at second thoughts I had a similar problem you may have to search for the post with photos. Did the new stanchions’ have fairly big holes at the bottom or was there a small hole slightly further up? Point being even though they look the same they are sometimes different (you might have to close the holes). Check what your old ones had also check if they are the same length as the old ones. With the bigger holes the restricter rods will force the oil out quicker especially if you use thinner oil.
Really try thicker oil 80 or so with increased volume.
End of the day if it’s sagging from the normal position it may be something else. How are the shocks normally if bounced up and down?
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
Advertisement
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
|
forks
|
cazzy |
Tiger Chat |
6 |
03-05-2009 11:13 AM |
|
CBR 600 RR forks on a ST
|
The Wild Wong |
Street Triple Forum |
1 |
08-02-2008 09:35 AM |
|
Looking for F3 forks
|
MAR |
Twins Technical Talk |
19 |
10-01-2007 03:39 PM |
|
Forks?
|
Merrimac |
Speed Triple Forum |
6 |
10-27-2006 12:05 AM |
|
Forks
|
nyolds |
Daytona Deliberations |
2 |
02-26-2005 08:31 AM |
|