Quote:
Originally Posted by road_dog
Good point. Here's a view that gives a much better perspective of the width.
IMO, the motor doesn't look quite as wide as one might imagine it would be.

|
If it didn't have that ****ed canteen, I'd hit on it like it was Salma Hayek in my bedroom...
A fine effort in breaking into the big league "CRUISER" market...For those of us who ride cruisers (25 k plus miles a year/ cross country / and daily driver) this gives us another great option.... Just think how different that sound is going to be if you drill those megaphones....The bulk in width is great as is the larger rear tire. The fact is Triumph doesn't have an offering I can just jump on and scoot in comfort to Sturgis on without looking ridiculous on the Rocket....(sorry about that)
I guess yaw'all don't realize just how puny Bloor's sales specs are in the American market...yet as 'niche' bikes the trumps sell out and he has kept sales growing (one of the few to achieve this recently)....Each and every one of these will be sold....
This puts Triumph on the map with an offerring that's competitive...if it does well (as I am sure it will), with the option to expand the niche...
It ain't ever going to have an affect on Hardley sales, on kawasukis or hondayamas....but it doesn't have to.
yeah I have a Scrambler and love it for what it's good for, but puuulease quit this winning about a cruiser looking like a ...a....omygod....a "CRUISER" .......
uh oh...gotta so...Salma wants to go riding.....
The Big Boo