» Sponsors
Springfield ArmoryTrident-Exhausts.comBikeBanditRacerPartsWholesaleMotorcycle.comCycleGear.comSportbikeTrackGearAnnitori DistributingTriumphPerformanceUSAbritishcustoms

» Sponsors

Trident-Exhausts.com
Please Visit our Site Sponsors Page

View Single Post
Old 10-27-2007   #7 (permalink)
ohiorider
Senior Member
Team Owner
 
ohiorider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hudson, Ohio - USA
Posts: 3,868
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCCTrim View Post
I think it's important to note that...( in my own experience )...differences seen on paper from a dyno and differences felt by the seat of the pants are 2 different things. When I altered my cam timing I only advanced the exhaust cam, leaving the intake in it's stock position.

The difference on paper was almost negligable, but by the seat of the pants the difference was certainly noticable. The bike pull's harder down low now, with a little noticeable loss on top. A little difficult to notice the loss as with so many mods the bikes pull's like hell anyway.

But there was a definate change for the good down low. For the street I'd only advise advancing the exhaust cam on the 790 powered bonnies.
The bike felt like it pulled harder at lower rpm, but I wasn't sure if it was actual or the placebo effect.

Bob
__________________
2003 T100 (790cc) Lucifer Org and Silv: 122/42 jets, TORs, 17T, UNI filter, no AI, Polaris bellmouth, Metzeler ME880 tires, Progressive 440 shocks (105/150 springs),11-1126 fork springs, gaiters, MotoTwin low bars, 6024 lamp, htd grips, 12v outlet.
ohiorider is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Motorcycle News, Videos and Reviews
Harley Davidson Suzuki GSXR Honda 600RR Yamaha R6
Sportbike Forums GSXR Forum Honda 1000RR Yamaha R1
Sportbikes Forum Ducati Forum Kawasaki ZX R6 Forum
Motorcycle Forum Ducati Monster Kawasaki Forum R1 MessageNet

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.