» Sponsors
Motorcycle.comAdvanstarMotorcycleShowsTrident-Exhausts.comRacerPartsWholesaleAnnitori DistributingSpringfield ArmoryShopTriumph.comMotorcycle.com Classifieds!BikeBanditTriumphPerformanceUSA

» Sponsors

CycleGear.com
Please Visit our Site Sponsors Page

View Single Post
Old 05-28-2006   #3 (permalink)
pigpen955
Senior Member
Formula Extreme
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maine
Posts: 675
I traded a Weestrom as they are affectionally known for my Scrambler. There is no question the Suzuki had more pop than a stock Scrambler (not sure how that translates to a Bonnie). However, the motor is very peaky and under normal conditions a lot more shifting is required to have access to the power. The motor is also more buzzy, not nearly as smooth as the Scrambler. Over all I much prefer the Scrambler for what I was/am using the bike for as a daily commuter through a mix of back roads and city streets.

If I need power, have to carry stuff, or am on a very long ride I opt for the Tiger which does everything the strom did only significantly better.

Fred

PS (edited in): The one thing the strom does better than either Triumph is that it got 25% better gas mileage (50 vs. 40 miles per US gallon).

[ This message was edited by: pigpen955 on 2006-05-28 14:49 ]
__________________
No such thing as cold weather, just inappropriate clothing.
pigpen955 is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Motorcycle News, Videos and Reviews
Harley Davidson Suzuki GSXR Honda 600RR Yamaha R6
Sportbike Forums GSXR Forum Honda 1000RR Yamaha R1
Sportbikes Forum Ducati Forum Kawasaki ZX R6 Forum
Motorcycle Forum Ducati Monster Kawasaki Forum R1 MessageNet

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.